>>19160286

realistic possibilities:

tourist put it down by accident, forgot.

tourist put it down intentionally to make a statement

domestic intelligence placed it there to make a statement or cause a stir

foreign intelligence, same reason

it belongs to secret service member or wh staff

it belongs to bidens or some other politician

there are plenty of ways it could happen, and sure they search everyone but its not a pat down/ strip search.

we just don't have enough info.

but the people "in charge" do… that's the hard part to swallow.

>>19160354

simply, it's plausible. the only evidence that it isn't something that straightforward is that the wh won't release the tapes.

crazy people do dumb illegal shit all the time.

>>19160357

kek good catch.

oi you got a license for that poorly constructed negative evidence mate.

>16bdb688

ding dong brit bong gtfo mi0

>>19160391

> Coke heads would not be seen anywhere near the white house.

yet we know there's at least one, probably more.

> See, they need it and don't want to lose it at ANY cost…

(assuming cocaine addicts are rational kek)

> Surely the sight of one sniffer dog next to an agent with a gun

clear british intelligence shining through

>would suffice in dettering a crack head from snorting lines

do you actually know the difference here?

> instaed

baaaa.

> We can tell.

ayuh. i guess buckle up pal.

>>19160454

>utter PISH

at least you're self aware.

I'm leaning towards foreign intelligence dropping it off. is that what the wh is saying? maybe that's why you're mad.

>>19160491

which is more damaging?

further confirmation that hunter is a degenerate

vs

current dogshit admin can't keep retarded British agents from dropping off illegal chemicals in a public yet heavily monitored location?

your triggering may now commence.