>vatican shill
Are you referring to the same individual(s) that used to have there own breads on the RCC?
Anon used to go there and peruse through those breads occasionally. Got the distinct feelz that claims were legit, based on the info provided in the RCC breads.
Also seemed to be that said bread owner/op followed Q pretty much.
Did not see much, if any, challenges to the claims made there. Although this Anon does not possess the knowledge/education to refute said RCC claims.
That said, regarding the "Vatican" memes in the QR breads, other than cries of "shill", has anyone refuted said memes/claims made by the poster?
It would be worthwhile if that can be done.
If said "Vatican" claims are legit, (or at least, can't be refuted), then they are not really shills, just spammers.