Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 10:58 a.m. No.19161854   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1875 >>1898 >>1927

>>19161840

Even when it stares you in the face you can't see sarcasmโ€ฆ

And to think I'm on your side when it comes to free speechโ€ฆ You are not presenting a very appealing case for usโ€ฆ

That's the thing about supporting free speech, it includes defending retards like youโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 11:25 a.m. No.19161996   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2022

>>19161962

>you spoke on behalf of everyone,

I spoke my opinion. That's mine. I don't talk for others. By "us" in my post I meant you and me.

>should I keep calling you a jew?

Call me what you want. But if you insist, my pronouns are anon/anon.

I'm not gonna stop calling you a Jew though. kek.

 

Where did the negotiative tone come from btw? Did I out Muh Jooh the Muh Jooh?

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 11:49 a.m. No.19162114   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2171

>>19162098

>I will show you what is over the top. Keck.

I bet you will.

They really aren't sending their bestโ€ฆ

Please tell me you are just an intern or on a trial period and you don't get payed for this.

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 12:22 p.m. No.19162298   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19162287

>Are you saying that all mixed-race children are the result of rape and incest?

No, I'm saying that race-mixing is abominable on the level of rape and incest.

And you know that.

Your comeback was not as clever as you think.

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 12:32 p.m. No.19162347   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2365

>>19162326

>Your shitty meme shows an old man and 2 mixed children, therefore it is not even about fucking, but about the children

You don't read i pressume. I mean there are big white bold letters plastered on top of it. It don't mention the children at all but the man between them and his granddaughter not featured in the photo (presumably fucking Tyrone down the street).

>But let's look what the based Nazis did to married couples.

Kek. Nazis were the Jews. You think I support Nazis? Fucking kek.

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 12:42 p.m. No.19162389   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19162362

>You didn't have to.

Don't call me Tranimae if you don't know the lore. Kek.

>Your vocabulary is your tell.

Be specific. I was.

>Oh, now I'm using Tranimae's catch phrases, huh?

Noโ€ฆ you are using Muh Joo shills catch phrasesโ€ฆ

Look here โ†’ >>19162364

>Sauce on him coining the phrase AntiMuhJoo?

When did I claim that?

>>>you ratfuck piece of shit.

Is one of the Muh Joos preferred insults.

Anonymous ID: 001731 July 11, 2023, 1:09 p.m. No.19162534   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2550

>>19162511

>>shit, indeed

>I accept your concession.

"Shit" as in nothing. No concessions here.

>>19162513

>Explain your reasoning behind the claim that me and that other Anon are tag teaming you.

Not a claim, just a hunch.

>Go on, I'll wait.

Why? Do you really care that much? It's kinda creepy and flattering at the same time.

>I picked up on your formatting, afterthought, it's a muscle memory thing that's hard to conceal between personas.

I don't have personas, I have me.

Be specific, (again) I was - what are my personas. What formatting did you pick up on?