Anonymous ID: 7e963f July 11, 2023, 8:44 p.m. No.19164694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4718 >>4732

Santa Clara University Students Must Take Covid Vaccines or Withdraw

 

College COVID vaccine mandates remain some of the most coercive mandates ever declared. While most colleges have now rescinded their mandates, some colleges refuse to let go, and Santa Clara University in California is one of the most oppressive.

 

In late April 2021, after most incoming freshmen had committed, SCU announced that all students were required to get COVID vaccines for fall enrollment or after full approval, whichever was later.

 

Then by mid-summer, SCU announced that students would be required to receive the vaccine even if it remained authorized only for emergency (EUA) and despite the fact that the CA Health and Safety Code codifies the Nuremberg Code. Section 24172 states

 

“(t)here is, and will continue to be, a growing need for protection for citizens of the state from unauthorized, needless, hazardous, or negligently performed medical experiments on human beings. It is, therefore, the intent of the Legislature, in the enacting of this chapter, to provide minimum statutory protection for the citizens of this state with regard to human experimentation and to provide penalties for those who violate such provisions.”

 

SCU (and many other CA colleges and universities) are in direct violation of this Code for removing informed consent by mandating EUA medical treatments.

 

Despite lack of efficacy or adequate safety data for this overwhelmingly healthy young adult population, in December 2021, SCU mandated the booster, midway through the academic year when students would have no choice but to comply or leave tens of thousands of dollars behind. SCU’s three-dose requirement remained through the 2022-23 school year.

 

In complete disregard for the end of the emergency declarations, in early April 2023, when most universities like nearby Stanford were announcing the end of their COVID vaccine mandates, SCU updated its requirement for incoming freshmen.

 

On May 8th, one week after the fall 2023 enrollment deadline, SCU quietly updated its COVID vaccine policy to require one bivalent dose for incoming freshmen (but not returning students) regardless of how many COVD vaccines they had previously taken. SCU backdated this announcement to May 1st thinking no one would take notice, but in private emails from incoming students learned that some were furious. We encouraged them to withdraw and accept another offer.

 

On May 31st, SCU updated its policy again. They now require either three previously taken monovalent doses or one bivalent dose for all community members. As with the University’s previous mandates, SCU offers no religious exemptions and limited medical exemptions for students even in the most extreme of circumstances as explained below. Faculty and staff, however, are permitted to request exemptions.

 

SCU’s policy is determined by its opaque “COVID-19 team,” believed to be led by campus physician Dr. Lewis Osofsky, who also holds several positions at Santa Clara County Medical Association (SCCMA). SCCMA partners with the Santa Clara County Public Health Department (SCCPH) to maximize COVID-19 vaccinations. Santa Clara County is one of the most vaccinated counties in the country, with more than a third having received the bivalent booster, twice the national average, and 88.5 percent having received the primary series.

 

https://brownstone.org/articles/santa-clara-university-students-must-take-covid-vaccines-or-withdraw/

Anonymous ID: 7e963f July 11, 2023, 8:47 p.m. No.19164709   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4721

Subpoena Of Transgender Health Group's Documents Postponed Until 2024 Amid Stonewalling Transparency Efforts

 

The World Professional Association For Transgender Health (WPATH) has until April 2024 to produce documents subpoenaed by an Alabama judge in March.

 

U.S. District Judge Liles Burke filed an internal documents request from WPATH as part of an ongoing lawsuit over the state’s ban on gender transition treatments for children. The law prohibits doctors from prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to patients 18 and under. Doctors who violate the law could face up to 10 years in prison.

 

WPATH, an advocate for child sex changes, was repeatedly referenced by plaintiffs arguing against Alabama’s ban.

 

The subpoena could reveal how WPATH has arrived at the conclusion child gender transition treatments are safe and medically necessary, despite multiple European countries urging caution on the procedures. The medical organization has been stonewalling efforts to reveal their methods for months, in a move some experts told the Daily Caller in May is indicative of guilt.

 

Judge Burke postponed the trial date from August to April 2, 2024, allowing WPATH more time to produce the requested documents, according to the Associated Press.

 

WPATH set standards of care for those with a “eunuch” gender identity in 2022, recommending orchiectomy, or castration, as a treatment option. WPATH used information from the Eunuch Archive in setting these standards of care, which the medical organization itself described as “filled with fantasy,” containing stories of child castration, pedophilia and sexual torture.

 

WPATH has recently pushed to remove any minimum age requirement to undergo sex change surgeries or cross-sex hormone therapy.

 

During a similar lawsuit in Florida, a district court ordered WPATH, the Endocrine Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to comply with a subpoena of all documents related to their guidance for transgender-identified kids in March. An amicus brief filed April 7 on behalf of the attorneys general for 17 states highlighted the stark contrast between transgender guidance for minors in Europe versus in the U.S.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2023/07/11/subpoena-wpath-documents-postponed-2024-transgender-medical-group-transparency-efforts/