>Morning, frenz
>Caviezel told Kirk: "Then you find out it's not QAnon, there's Q and anons. And Q puts out a question and you are not allowed to ask questions anymore—not allowed to—and the anons, they look it all up and they start looking and investigating that stuff."
4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct172020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
kek
>no socks
>good morning Ralph.