Hunt: It seems like every single hearing that we have in this room, we talk about the two-tiered justice system of Biden's DOJ and the FBI…President Trump endured an unprecedented raid at his home in Mar-a-Lago. [Biden's] home was respectfully browsed. President Trump is facing up to four hundred years in federal prison for allegedly being in possession of classified documents he obtained as Commander in Chief of these United States of America. And meanwhile, [Biden] is facing no charges for the classified documents he had held as his time as a senator and a vice president. Not the president of the United States of America…he had no legal authority the declassify those documents.

Hunt: It's my opinion that Joe Biden is the most unpopular president we've seen in a century, and that's why he knows the only was to stop President Trump from beating him in November, is by putting him in jail…some have said that President Trump's indictment means that n oone is above the law…but what about Hillary Clinton, and what about Joe Biden, and what about Hunter Biden, who is America's favorite son?…James Comey decided not to prosecute Hillary Clinton, despite overwhelming evidence that she committed crimes…it was the decision of the FBI not to prosecute because they didn't want to interfere with a presidential election. What do you call this? The Iowa caucuses are in six months!

Van Drew: Tell me yes or no. Yes or no.

Director Wray: Excuse me?

Van Drew: Please answer yes or no.

Director Wray: It's not a yes or no question.

Van Drew: It is a yes or no. If you've got a list of churches that you're targeting and looking at, the answer is yes. If you don't , the answer is no.

Direrctor Wray: If your question is do we have a list of churches we are targeting, then the answer is no.

Eight days ago on July 4th in the western district of Louisiana. The court found that the federal government suppressed Americans first amendment free speech rights. In his conclusion on page 1 54 the court said this, the judge said this plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition opposition to COVID-19 vaccines, opposition to COVID-19 mask in lockdowns opposition to the lab leak theory of COVID-19, opposition to the validity of the 2020 election, opposition to President Biden's policies, statements that the Hunter Biden laptop was true and opposition to policies of the government officials in power all were suppressed.It is quite telling that each example or category of suppressed speech was conservative in nature. The court further writes the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth specific to the FBI.

The court said this, the FB I's failure to alert social media companies that the Biden laptop story was real and not Russian disinformation is particularly troubling. The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social media companies repeatedly to look out for quote hack and dump operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election. Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the laptop story was Russian disinformation.

The FBI refused to comment resulting in social media companies suppression of this story. And as a result, millions, millions of our fellow citizens did not hear this story prior to the November 3rd 2020 election. Additionally, the FBI was included in industry meetings, bilateral meetings received and forwarded alleged misinformation to social media companies and actually misled companies in regard to the laptop story. When the court says the FBI misled, that's a nice way of saying they lied, they lied. And as a result, important information was kept from we the people days before the most important election, we have election of President United States election of the Commander in Chief in a survey last fall, four out of five Americans said they believe there's a two tiered system of justice in America today.

Gooden: Now to China, most Americans don't realize, I don't think that us companies doing business in China are required to have joint venture agreements that's been around since 2017 or 18, I believe. And it requires the Chinese Communist Party to have political cells within these enterprises. American enterprises in China. In the last few weeks, it has come to my attention that they've taken that up a notch and actually gone further. The Chinese have and said that not only must they be present and have access, but they now control these American businesses. So they're in essence nationalizing American enterprise is in China. And the CEO S I've talked to are afraid to say something. They say they've come to the FBI, the FBI I think is aware of this. I'm, I'm about to turn it over to you. My question is, is this happening and what can be done about it? What do we need to do about it?

Wray: Well, I think you've, you've put your finger on a very important issue and frankly, one that does not get the attention that it really deserves. So I appreciate you bringing it up. I will say that in my view, there is no country, none that presents a broader, more comprehensive threat to our ideas, our innovation, our economic security than the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party. And in many ways, it represents, I think the defining threat of our era. And when it comes specifically to the business community, while there's no law against joint ventures, the problem that we have is that the Chinese government all too often has exploited those joint ventures to then use them as ways to get improper access to companies secrets and information.

Gooden: Do you find that they have stepped it up though, to where they are, in essence nationalizing us companies quietly in a variety of ways?

Wray: I hadn't really thought of using that term, but I think you're on to a very important point. I'll give you an example that's that I think a lot of people in America still don't know about and would be shocked to hear. Which is that really any company of any size in China is required required by Chinese law to have what they quaintly call a committee, which is essentially a cell inside the company whose sole function is to ensure that company's compliance with Chinese Communist Party orthodoxy. If we tried to install something like that in American companies, or if the British tried to do it in British companies or any number of other places, people would go out of their minds and rightly so well, thank you. I'd like to work with you more on that and I had to yield the balance of my time to the chairman. Thank you.

Jordan: But that's exactly what you did!

>>19169630

Just sold one a few years ago, don's miss putting gas in it.

>>19169733

[Rom 8:28 KJV] 28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.

Praying for you Jim!