>c.s.s.c.p.s.g.p
Time is "Time Cube" level schizo
How weird it is that the National Socialists back then carry the same values as the leftist Socialists of today
>He picked Knife Party, Centipede.
He picked the same pre-packaged factory music you've always listened to.
>Mind blowing stuff.
←
AI still can't do hands
>AI is fake and gay.
Generative models aren't fake… which is all these models claim to be. AI is just the name that stuck because it sounds better than LLM.
If you mean Artificial "Intelligence" like actually understanding the output it produces, it might be fake.
>It is stupid beyond belief.
As I said… I never claimed it to be intelligent.
It's a Large Language Model trained on the clear net and moderated by silicone valley trannies.
It's not hard to break.
Microsoft found a way to prevent you breaking Bing chat. They just block you from writing if you've veered too far from the narrative.
No one, anywhere, is credibly claiming to have intelligent machines… only lonely crackpot google engineers with a robosexual fetish.
>“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble,
I'm not Christian so I might lack the proper spiritual powers to truly interpret this.
But the way I understand this, with the understanding that God is the "Father", "The little ones—those who believe in me" could refer to every Christian including their children. They are little, not in a demeaning way but in a protective way, in the eyes of God.
>Obvious infant rape reference
>>to stumble
<verb
<trip or momentarily lose one's balance; almost fall.
Is usually a term used to describe set back in some way. Like losing belief in God.
I see no "Obvious" reference to rape in that verse, and I would personally use a way stronger word than "stumple" to describe it - but what do I know, I'm not God.
Thank you, but it was clearly a joke.
Thanks, I'd say the preceding verse supports my interpretation.
>but the thought still stands.
Sure. Weren't arguing that.
>To me, He speaks in coincidence and synchronicity
If that is what you define as God, sure. It uses the same language with me, I think.
As a non-believer I'm just more comfortable calling it 'unexplainable'.