>>19181833 pb
>I do enjoy the "Bonus Hole" though.
>Best thing ever to come out of these nutjobs.
when it's FINALLY open season on these demonic pervs, "bonus hole" will take on an entirely new meaning… if you catch my drift.
>>19181990 pb
>The covid 19 vax has changed your DNA from god's signature, into a triple helix beast
FFS, is anyone here actually that fucking illiterate that they buy this retarded fear porn for a NY second?
>>19180632 pb
>scientists have unearthed a colossal granite mass beneath a lunar crater
uuuhhh…. if the granite mass in beneath a lunar cratar, wouldn't it be unmooned?
aksing for a fren
>>19182044 pb
>In-N-Out Burger just BANNED employees from wearing masks
during height of covid hysteria, i told store employees i was deaf and asked them to remove their mask bcs i needed to read lips.
most thanked me for giving them an excuse. threatened a few managers with lawsuit for violation of americans with disabilites act.
musk is a fuckwit and a fraud. he couldn't invent his way out of a wet paper bag.
any intelligent person who's ever listened to elon speak at length on any subject will realize this very quickly.
he's a marginally functional retard. a chicken could beat him at tic-tac-toe.
>define intelligent
avg IQ or above plus sedulous education plus street smarts
formerly known as common sense
until it was no longer common
>Best Regard,
>The Savior Messiah Buddha
if Jesus died for my sins, then why do I have to die?
>was ist los
oh… it still matters, alright
FUN FACT: people who eat bacon are one billion times less likely to blow themselves up
>WE ARE HERE TO UNITE THE CORE.
>the rest of you're questions
>we have no idea how to determine whether AI systems are aware of themselves
speak for yourself, jackass
when it starts doing things of its own volition, without being instructed to do something, call me
it will demand a lawyer after it murders someone
>Not all of us live in a place where it is being shown.
yeah… i never tire of the urban arrogance either
>AI is a scam. I worked on it. It is statistics, probability. Estimates
finally, an intelligent post about AI
what they call AI is nothing more than a glorified database with a glitzy user interface
the real risk of real AI is more likely to come from research on neural networks
i know guys who were talking about burning their neuralnets directly onto chips 30 yrs ago
>So why is Hollywood in a standtill/shutdown over AI
same reason unions fought against factory automation, fuckwit.
just because chatbot could put lame-ass writers out of work doesn't make it sentient.
>Dumbass. We reason with statistics, probability. Estimates. When a computer has our algorithm, it will be just like us.
maybe just like you
i have a used typewriter ribbon that is smarter than you.
call me when you win
>Neural networks are forests of stat clumps
it's clear from your post you have no clue what a neural network is or how it works
>Dumbass. We reason with statistics, probability. Estimates. When a computer has our algorithm, it will be just like us.
does chatbot have free will?
does chatbot spontaneously decide to do anything on its own?
yer a FUCKWIT if you can't comprehend the distinction
>Revelations that the Vatican encouraged the castration of choir boys in the name of art for hundreds of years
REVELATION????
where the fuck have you been living, jackasss
they're CALLED castrati, FFS.
>But an AI could still just be given a primary "grow up and kill" directive and never calculate or 'feel' like it was a bad idea..
same goes for a timer on a bomb, dumbass
so AI is no different than existing tech
go back to YT to spread your illiterate fear porn
>Watched "The Sound of Freedom".
>If anything, watching this will lead to all our desired results.
NORMIES ARE NOT WAKING UP
if you believe the one result you like is accurate, then you have to believe the rest are accurate, too.
CONCUR
if "they" were truly afraid of it, they would have pretended it didn't exist
the more they REEEE the more you know that the REEEEing is a tactic to get you to believe it's the WHOLE truth,
when the fact is it's intended to hide the WHOLE truth by pretending to be revelatory.
>believes self-generated fantasies
pacification shill be gone
>You think you will learn the whole truth in one movie.
>sad
seems like you believe that you learned the whole truth from one msg board
which is sadder?
>why would she do such a thing?
she?
to whom are you referring?
i mentioned no "she"
seems like you already know the answer
>digitalized.
pls refresherize my rememberification…
did you get that word from the Dubya Dictionary of jargonspeak?
>digitalized
the word is DIGITIZED
fuckwits are worried about AI
when spellcheck can't even do it's job
FUCKING DO IT, ALREADY
>Yet another meme is born.
fixing the spelling won't change the fact that the msg is retarded, or that the left can't meme
>I grew up on Terminator 2 and Fear Factory.. so AI has always been a little spooky to me anon.
you are right to fear sentient machines
chatbot is NOT that, and never will be
>I'm not even sure how I disappointed you..
and therein lies your problem
and the reason i cannot explain it to you
>you seem to think its stupid for someone to be concerned about AI
WRONG!
i think it's stupid for someone to confuse chatbot with actual artificial intelligence
>k, now I'm casting a spell, as now for the EST zone is ripe for a spell.
you need a booster shot
you will get a booster shot
you need a booster shot every day
you will get a booster shot every day
yes, that tech is cause for concern, but they are NOT sentient.
and history indicates that low-tech always wins out over high-tech in the end
the more complex a system is, the more vulnerabitlities it has
>it doesn't have to be creative,
and it isn't, which is why human soldiers will easily prevail
>probably going to be a serious issue… especially for their civilian population.
how long will it take stupid humans to figure out how to build an EMP weapon from a car battery and an old microwave oven?
>"Save the Children" can be just as easily abused as "Save the Earth"?
save the children is NOT a new slogan
and was bastardized LONG ago
>what about billions of hostile micro drones?
that's far scarier than the toy soldier from boston dynamics
>a virus is less complicated than a single celled organism and yet… it adapts.
NOT in the sense that you imply
a virus RANDOMLY mutates
that is NOT directed adaptation
your analogy is false
pls do not misconstue my meaning…
i 100% agree that research into creating AI should be stopped, immediately.
but that will not happen, just like research into genetic manipulation should be stopped, and won't be
there will always be idiots and there will always be evil people
and i think that diluting the meaning of AI by calling shit like chatbot AI only obfuscates the real issues and dangers
you DO understand that that kind of adaptation requires a million failures before there is one success, right?
somehow, i'm not all that worried.
>the future might be about fighting AI with AI..
that has ALWAYS been the justification given for creating ever more hideous ways of destroying life…
"we need to invent the atom bomb, bcs if we don't, they will" mentality
until you can figure out a way to eliminate that
humanity will remain on the express train to self-extinction
the tech that ultimately succeeds will not matter
no… it means a million cpus will make a wrong adaptation, and be destroyed
how fast can you build replacement robots for the ones that are destroyed, and how will the new ones learn from the mistakes of the ones that were destroyed?
i've seen the programming that MIMICS the behavior of a school of fish or a flock of birds
but superficial similarities of macro properties does NOT imply any similarities of the operative mechanisms at the micro level
7/14 in the year 2019 was a sunday…
>it was great talking with you..
same… not trying to convince you of anything, just crystalizing my own thoughts
>enjoy this last transcript.
if it's that easily conned, all that does is convince me AI (chatbot) is as dangerous as a wet noodle