when people run psy ops they run it as if they are 'anon'
they run it over and over
then someone like you pretends that 'anon wanted to believe' whatever lie it was when, in fact, everyone was always skeptical.
shill fail
you make a statement of 'the anon want to believe' when you have no proof that anyone other than the team ever would say or repeat those things that you claim that the 'anon believe'.
that is why you are shilling. You are making up that anon beieve something, as if anon don't have skepticism as part of the repetoir, when anon do.
of course you didn't say 'all anon' and I don't speak for 'all anon'.
you disresepct the intelligence of people who use this board and pretend that all these hyper-reptitive postings of falsehood are a grand success and that anon are all fooled by it.
PS: you didn't offend me.
the constant push of false narrative is something that everyone has to contend with.
and thus we project that someone flaw exists in others to cover up the idea of the insipid efforts of bad people who shill.
you say you are shilling 'the truth', but what you do is a kind of slandering of the board by implying that people who use it are easy prey of the psy-op crews.
also often people project as if they believe to try and draw out the cray-cray narrative of the teams of shills. The play the role of 'naive' or 'rube' to do more investigation into whatever message is being attempted to be implanted into the common discourse.
next board? huh, you're going to start a whole new board for this slide?
sometimes the confirmation shilling is too obvious to ignore.
no, please do not elaborate
this is a slide.