OVERWHELMING PROOF that the COVID-19 Plandemic was officially planned out and executed by the U.S. Federal Government (and other state actors)

The COVID-19 Plandemic was, in fact, planned out over many decades within the highest echelons of the US government. It also confirms that an extremely powerful shadow government was directing every facet of the vast lobbying efforts and legislative processes necessary to pull off this ongoing crime wave against the American people. This means that the barbarians have been inside the gate and operating freely at least since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

What makes this immense body of evidence so compelling is the extraordinary chronology of official governmental acts and essential legislation from start to finish. It’s as though the well-concealed perpetrators designed the perfect one-two punch to first knock down, and then knock out, the U.S. citizenry. The launch of the COVID-19 bioweapon was obviously the “first punch” which perfectly set up the weaponized Covid vaccine “second punch”.

This hard scientific evidence shows that, not only was the COVID-19 bioweapon meticulously bioengineered over several decades, it’s stealthy release was coordinated with several conspiring nations, especially throughout the Zio-Anglo-American Axis sphere of of influence. Clearly, the ultimate intention was the global administration of an exceedingly injurious and often lethal COVID-19 injection in order to depopulate planet Earth.

Of course, there are also volumes of highly authoritative data/info that demonstrate the explicit intent to commit genocide against the American people as well as against other traditionally white Christian nations. There’s only one global crime syndicate and malevolent secret society that possesses both the prodigious power and pervasive influence to carry out such a capital crime spree against all of humanity and effectively cover it up. See: The World Wars And All Other Cataclysmic Events Were Carried Out By THE TRIAD

In light of these highly consequential statements of historical fact supported with incriminating documentation, it’s absolutely imperative that every attorney working on this case be made aware of the covert “American Domestic Bioterrorism Program” delineated in great detail below. Therefore, we ask our great SOTN Patriots to post and send out this link everywhere and anywhere.

BOTTOM LINE: There’s no more definitive and legally airtight body of evidence that verifies a highly organized conspiratorial plot to perpetrate both mass murder and injury against the American people. Hence, every single injured and aggrieved party ought to be aware of this extensive and irrefutable report. Thank you for disseminating this vital report far and wide.

More

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2023/07/14/overwhelming-proof-that-the-covid-19-plandemic-was-officially-planned-out-and-executed-by-the-u-s-federal-government-and-other-state-actors/

‘No Forensic Evidence to Prove It’ – Top Spox John Kirby Brushes Off Biden White House Cocaine Scandal

On Sunday, White House spox John Kirby brushed off the Biden White House cocaine scandal after the investigation concluded without identifying a suspect.

Secret Service closed its investigation into the Biden White House cocaine scandal without conducting any interviews.

The Secret Service on Thursday concluded its investigation into the cocaine scandal that rocked the White House earlier this month.

No suspect was identified.

No fingerprints, DNA samples, or leads!

According to Secret Service spokesman Anthony Gugliemi, the agency didn’t interview the 500 potential culprits because it would be a strain on resources.

Kirby brushed off the cocaine scandal

“I can’t really speak to the investigation that was done by the Secret Service, they did the best they could … they just were not able to come up with any forensic evidence that proves it,” Kirby said to Fox News anchor Shannon Bream.

No forensics. No skin cells. No fingerprints. No DNA. No cameras.

Got it?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/no-forensic-evidence-prove-it-top-spox-john/

Domestic violence-focused Operation Amarok III makes 592 arrests, lays more than 1,000 charges across NSW

Almost 600 people have been arrested and more than 1,000 charges laid across New South Wales in a police operation targeting domestic and family violence.

Key points:

Operation Amarok was previously conducted in February, April and July

The NSW Police deputy commissioner called DV offences cowardly

An advocate says increasing police powers is a simplistic response

The four-day blitz under the latest Operation Amarok resulted in 592 arrests and 1,107 charges, along with 22 guns being seized.

It comes as police say more than half of the state’s murders are domestic violence related.

Tara Hunter, chief executive of women's counselling service Full Stop, called the results of the operation an indication of apprehended violence orders falling short.

"What it demonstrates is that there are a lot of people out there that are not complying with AVOS," she said.

"It's great to see such an active police response but we would like to see it as a consistent part of policing."

Ms Hunter said that in the past week, eight women have died due to alleged domestic violence in Australia.

For domestic and family violence charges, the state is on track to reach its highest offence rate in more than three years.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-16/dv-focused-operation-amarok-iii-arrests-592-lays-1107-charges/102607814

How The 'Great Society' Destroyed The Nuclear Family Structure In One Chart

Who destroyed the American family?

The argument can be made that the Great Society programs initiated the destruction of the nuclear family structure. The blame starts with President Lyndon B. Johnson's set of domestic programs in the mid-1960s that were used to fight 'poverty' but only discouraged work and destabilized families.

Six long decades of socialist welfare programs have aided in the break up of the nuclear family structure. In fact, a central tenet of Marxism is to dismantle this structure.

Remember, the Black Lives Matter organization and Marxism share similar goals. BLM stated in 2020 it wanted to abolish the family as we know it:

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and "villages" that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

So clearly, there's been a half-century war on the nuclear family. The latest US Census data shows that a record number of Americans live alone.

Census data shows 27.6% of all US-occupied households were one-person households in 2020, up from just 7.7% in 1940. The largest share of people living alone occurred between 1970 and 1980, when the percentage increased from 17.6% to 22.7%, right after the welfare programs started.

So what's the result of progressives tearing down the nuclear family structure? Well, Just The News recently noted:

First, the US has the highest rate of single-parent households in the world. Second, the connection between single-parent households and crime is very strong. According to research carried out by Jerrod Brown, a behavioral specialist at Concordia St. Paul, the extant literature "suggests that children raised in single-parent households experience more physical and psychological problems compared to those raised in two-parent households." Moreover, he added, the "implications of homes in which fathers are absent may be important to explore for criminal justice and mental health professionals."

Maybe this whole Great Society experiment has gone terribly wrong. Let's try something different. Maybe bring back the family unit and dial back welfare programs.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/how-great-society-destroyed-nuclear-family-structure-one-chart

CDC Used Journal To Promote Masks Despite 'Unreliable' And 'Unsupported Data': New Analysis

A new analysis of studies in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) flagship scientific journal found the agency promoted the effectiveness of masks using unreliable data with conclusions unsupported by evidence.

The preprint, published July 11 on MedRxiv, found the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) made positive findings about the efficacy of masks 75 percent of the time, despite only 30 percent of studies testing masks, and less than 15 percent having “statistically significant results.”

No studies were randomized, yet the CDC in over half of their MMWR studies, made misleading statements indicating a causal relationship between mask-wearing and a decrease in COVID-19 cases or transmission, despite failing to show evidence of mask effectiveness.

The inappropriate use of causal language in MMWR studies was directly adopted by then CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky to promote masks and recommendations urging Americans to mask up. The authors said their findings “raise concern about the reliability of the journal for informing health policy” and suggest bias within the journal.

The MMWR, often called “the voice of the CDC,” is the agency’s primary vehicle for “scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations.”

The publication—subject only to peer review internally by the agency—is frequently used to draft national health policies. For example, mask requirements implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic for federal workers, travelers, schools, businesses, healthcare workers, and Head Start programs—“mirrored” CDC recommendations.

Of the 77 reviews cited in the agency’s MMWR used to promote masks, researchers found the following:

Only 23 of 77 studies assessed the effectiveness of masks, yet 58 of 77 studies claimed masks were effective.

Of the 58 studies, 41 used “causal language,” and 40 misused causal language. Causal language is where an “action or entity is explicitly presented as influencing another” and should not be used in observational studies because these types of studies merely identify “associations” and cannot establish that the “associations identified represent cause-and-effect relationships.”

According to the analysis, the 40 studies that used causal language indicated with certainty that masks lower transmission rates, despite the fact their results, at most, found a correlation. In addition, 25 of the 40 studies didn’t even assess the effectiveness of masks. The one remaining study used causal language related to particle filtration on mannequins with “unknown relevance for human health.”

Of the 58 studies referenced above, only one mentioned conflicting data on mask effectiveness—the authors noted it was an international study primarily focused on influenza.

Four of the 77 studies had more cases in the mask group than in the comparator group, yet all four studies concluded masks were effective.

None of the 77 studies assessed after 2019 were randomized, and none cited randomized data.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25191914/#:~:text=However%2C%20observational%20studies%20can%20only,cause%2Dand%2Deffect%20relationships.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.07.23292338v1.full