Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:50 a.m. No.19194779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4806 >>4810 >>4837 >>5003 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

Vivek Ramaswamy: Assessing the political views and statements of a presidential candidate

 

CodeMonkeyZ

 

Jul 17, 2023

 

“Politicians are like flags: they look good but just wave in whatever direction the breeze is blowing.” -Vivek Ramaswamy (December 28, 2020) [archived]

 

Our democratic society relies on the thorough vetting process of presidential candidates to ensure their competency and fitness for office. When candidates appear suddenly with significant popularity, yet little vetting, it might suggest manipulation is happening behind the scenes. When there is a lack of transparency and accountability, voters need more comprehensive information about the presidential candidate to gauge whether they are suitable for office or not.

 

A lack of vetting might result in conflicts of interest, overshadow weaknesses, and potentially even threaten national security, economic and social stability.

 

Let’s take a glimpse into Vivek Ramaswamy's Twitter feed and gain insights into his political perspectives and statements prior to his emergence as a presidential candidate.

 

January 6

 

Regarding January 6, Vivek was quite vocal in his condemnation of Donald Trump.

What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple. I’ve said it before and did so in my piece.

 

It does not stop there. Rahul Joshi replies to an earlier tweet from Vivek about Xi Jinping allegedly detaining Jack Ma.

in China, the President makes big tech billionaire disappear. In America, big tech billionaires make the President disappear. I don't know which one is scarier but both are terrifying

 

Original Tweet since deleted, but it remains [archived]

 

To which Vivek responded by doubling down on his criticism of Trump.

Both are terrifying. Unfortunately Trump’s egregious behavior last week blinds us from seeing that Big Tech’s cure is worse. Makes for a winning game for China in the long run. @ElbridgeColby

 

A few days after January 6, Trump was banned from Twitter and a few other Big Tech platforms, which prompted Trump to later go on to create Truth Social.

 

Vivek, in response to Trump’s ban from social media, praised Snapchat for being brave when they tweeted that they were also planning to ban Trump.

 

While the tone of his tweet might be seen by some as sarcastic, within the context of Vivek’s other tweets about Trump in the wake of January 6, it is not a stretch to assume he was being truthful and masking the truth with a thin veil of sarcasm.

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:51 a.m. No.19194783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4789 >>4806 >>4810 >>4818 >>5003 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

While acknowledging that we now live in a [Big Tech] dictatorship, Vivek tweets, “Forget about Trump.”

 

He continued on by putting light on the fact that Ron Paul’s public Facebook page had been limited, seemingly inferring that Ron Paul losing partial access to his Facebook page was more egregious than Trump being banned on nearly every social media platform of the day.

Forget about Trump. This is the dictatorship we now live in. One of America’s advocates for liberty has been censored by Facebook without explanation.

 

When Biden took office on January 20, 2021, Vivek was quick to defend Biden:

Look, I’m not holding my breath. But let’s give the guy a chance on his first day.

 

In an outright condemnation of Trump, Vivek seems concerned that big tech may also lock Biden's account.

Downright frightening. The era of corporate monarchy in America begins. I condemn President Trump for what he did this week, but the rise of the Silicon Leviathan is separately a big problem. What’s next - will they lock Biden’s account if he calls for a breakup of Big Tech?

 

Regarding the events of January 6, Vivek claimed that every American shares some responsibility for what happened.

Every American, every one of us, shares some responsibility for what happened yesterday. Issuing indignant condemnations is easy. Looking in the mirror is hard.

 

Yet he said not every American was responsible for the BLM riots.

No - just as we aren’t yet doing now either. It won’t be easy but that’s the hard work ahead

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:53 a.m. No.19194787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4806 >>4859 >>5003 >>5031 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

World Economic Forum

 

The World Economic Forum featured Vivek as a Young Global leader in 2021.

 

Vivek allegedly denied accepting the WEF YGL feature, and subsequentlysued the WEF for $2,500 dollars for putting his name on their page as a Young Global Leader.

 

As of July 16, 2023, Vivek is still featured on the Spanish version of the WEF website.

 

While it may be true that Vivek sued the WEF for featuring him as a Young Global Leader, allegedly without his permission, it remains a fact that Vivek was a Soros Fellow and was put through Yale’s law school by Soros.

 

Please note that Soros in this context refers to Paul Soros, the late older brother of George Soros.

 

The Soros Fellowship seems to have kept up with Vivek over the years, publishing some seemingly collaborative articles about Vivek on April 2017 [archived], March 2020 [archived], and April 2020 [archived].

 

Some might say it was simply a good business decision to accept a fellowship from Soros to put you through Yale’s law school.

 

Vivek, though, has seemingly maintained a good relationship with the Soros Fellowship as evidenced by one of his very first tweets being a direct reply to the Soros Fellowship:

 

Just joined earlier this year! Still slowly figuring out how it works 😀

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:55 a.m. No.19194792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4806 >>5003 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

Covid-19

 

In regards to Covid-19, Vivek's company Roivant Sciences’ Genevant Sciences and Arbutus are suing Pfizer with a lawsuit [archived] alleging that Pfizer infringed on their lipid nanoparticle technology to create the covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty.

 

Perhaps a perceived stake in the covid-19 vaccine, caused him to claim "the vaccine is the holy grail" on an interview with Tucker Carlson. [Source]

 

Vivek was quick to give credit to Biden for allowing more adults to be vaccine-eligible.

Biden says all adults will be vaccine-eligible by May 1. That’s good news. Give credit where due.

 

Vivek was also quick to recommend "[giving] everyone their first shot now", while praising a single-dose vaccination strategy.

 

A single-dose vaccination strategy is sensible right now: it doubles the number of people we’re able to vaccinate soon. Give everyone their first shot now, and wait for 2nd shot later until we have ample supply. Smart move by the UK to do this.

 

From a video posted to Vivek's Twitter account [archived], Tucker Carlson introduces Vivek as a member of Ohio's Coronavirus Response Team.

[sauce]

https://www.facebook.com/tuckercarlsonFOX/videos/2389361504695227/

 

Before Vivek announced his presidential campaign, he allegedly paid a Wikipedia editor [archived] to remove mention of his Ohio Coronavirus Response Team involvement.

 

Vivek praised Bernie Sander's Masks for All bill which was intended to provide every American with three N95 masks.

My policy views don’t often align with Bernie, but this strikes me as a sensible idea. The cost is a tiny fraction of other less compelling federal expenditures on COVID-19. They should have picked someone from the political right as a co-author to show consensus

 

According to Vivek, wearing a mask is a personal responsibility, and he felt it was puzzling when conservatives opposed mask wearing.

 

Vivek then goes on to talk about Conservatives as if he were a Liberal, while simultaneously noting the CDC and the WHO lied to the public in order to save masks for healthcare workers.

Wearing a mask = personal responsibility. It’s puzzling when conservatives oppose it. But before deriding them, remember this: CDC and WHO discouraged wearing masks in March - a “noble lie” to save masks for healthcare workers. Institutional lying erodes public trust in science

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:55 a.m. No.19194793   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4806 >>4854 >>5003 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

Could it be he is not a Conservative?

 

If Vivek were not a conservative, what could he be?

 

He appears to have high praise for classical liberal values, which in the context of American politics, may be described as 'fiscally conservative' and 'socially liberal' [archived].

 

Classical liberal values are very similar to modern Libertarian values, while taking a more socially liberal stance.

 

The Learn Liberty Project praised classical liberalism for playing a crucial role in advancing LGBTQ+ rights.

 

Bowers & Turgut in the University of Dayton Law Review defended Classical Liberalism's stance on abortion:

[prohibiting] government from interfering with individuals' choices made in the private sphere of their lives unless this interference is necessary to reaffirm natural rights. We also contend that the abortion decision resides in this private sphere.

Source: Bowers, J. R., & Turgut, U. (1991). Classical Liberalism, The Constitution, and Abortion Policy: Can Government Be Both Pro-Choice and Anti-Abortion? University of Dayton Law Review, 17(1), 2.

 

When Vivek said the Republican party had the opportunity to become the party of classical liberal values, did he intend to introduce both the advancement of LGBTQ+ rights and a relaxed stance on abortion into the GOP platform?

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:56 a.m. No.19194794   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4801 >>4805 >>4806 >>4817 >>4856 >>4897 >>4959 >>4983 >>5003 >>5297 >>5363 >>5467 >>5539

Conclusions

In light of Vivek's portrayal as a conservative candidate for president, his tweet history raises important questions. Has he fundamentally changed his beliefs, or is he merely putting up a facade? Furthermore, it remains unknown whether he still holds the views he previously expressed on Trump, Biden, and Covid-19. Would he continue to advocate for the vaccine, and if so, would that involve mandates? Additionally, concerns regarding Vivek's associates raise questions about how their influence may impact his politics if he were to become president.

 

https://codemonkeyz.substack.com/p/vivek-ramaswamy

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 5:56 a.m. No.19194796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4854

Vivek Ramaswamy, Presidential candidate, is WEF! His name has been scrubbed from the live WEF 2021 class of Young Global Leaders page. (Archive and live links in comments.)

posted 4 months ago by pepperonishoes

https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/16aTQYngWr/vivek-ramaswamy-presidential-can/c/

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:03 a.m. No.19194822   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19194810

>Vivek allegedly denied accepting the WEF YGL feature, and subsequentlysued the WEF for $2,500 dollars for putting his name on their page as a Young Global Leader.

 

Only sued for $2500 huh

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:09 a.m. No.19194841   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4846 >>4851 >>5003 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

Donald J. Trump ReTruthed

 

WATCHER222

@WATCHER222

Sep 18, 2022

prayer emjoi222

Sep 18, 2022, 2:48 PM

https://truthsocial.com/@WATCHER222/posts/109020898591749699

 

Attempted over throw, disinformation +++ - President Trump

1:13

https://rumble.com/embed/v1hz4dz/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:24 a.m. No.19194894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19194881

Every thing must have due process and fail including the 2024 election.

The stench of corruption must be so vile, that the real military (which is controlling this shit show) can step in legally and ethically.

Then the real work starts.

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:27 a.m. No.19194906   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19194881

answers

Note MI has the same SAPs as NSA, CIA etc as designated post 9-11. Why is this relevant?

 

SAP = Special Access Programs; things changed post 9/11 to encourage intelligence-sharing between agencies. This can include greater ability for those compromised to learn more and share more with others so compromised, to leak, to undermine operations for NS.

 

MI has different oversight than IC. They wouldn't be subject to the same corruption from the Joint Chiefs and SecDef that IC would and they have access to the same Information and SAP's

Who can be held hostage and controlled?

 

Anyone who has been compromised by bribery, drugs, personal foibles, sex, or their family members

 

Congress

Anyone with children/family

 

CIA thinks its foreign offshore assets are strong enough to defend against the US executive (not accounting for military use on domestic soil).

 

Controlling/comandeering the agency's access to funds would drastically hamper its operations, limit its ability maneuver and force it off balance. No access to funds = drastically less options

Why does the Constitution explicitly grant this authority to the President and what is it to prevent?

 

Allows the president to enforce US law when those supposed to support US law do not.

 

Prevent the breakup of the country and keep the Federal, State balance of power

 

Article I, Section 8; Clause 15, the United States Congress is given the power to pass laws for "calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." The President of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the state militias "when called into the actual Service of the United States." (Article II, Section 2). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Guard_of_the_United_States

 

Also the NG can be deployed under title 32 to protect infrastructure. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406 read bullets 1,2,3 10 U.S. Code § 12406

Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play.

 

The Organisation and Guidance Department of the Korean Workers’ Party (the OGD is the crux of real, as opposed to symbolic, dictatorial power in North Korea)

 

http://newfocusintl.com/north-koreas-hidden-power-system/

Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.

SUMMARY

 

The Military Intel has the same SAPs as NSA, CIA etc as designated post 9-11. Someone can be held hostage and controlled.

 

CIA thinks its foreign offshore assets are strong enough to defend against the US Executive (not accounting for military use on domestic soil). The Constitution explicitly grants this authority to the President and look what it prevents. Some things must remain classified til the very end.

 

North Korea is not being run by Kim, he's an actor in the play. There is a director. The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:28 a.m. No.19194909   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4963

>>19194881

extra answers

Note MI has the same SAPs as NSA, CIA etc as designated post 9-11. Why is this relevant?

 

Pentagon plans for everything. The Office of Contingency and the Disaster Government (shadow gov) which became a full time program within the White House in the PATRIOT, 2005 edition ensured there is always a plan for everything. SAPs operate on a different system then the DNI setup, which allows them to work on their own training and infrastructure grid. This is relevant if you think back to how the original 1788 militas were founded.

Who can be held hostage and controlled?

 

Illegal enemy combatants. Military Commissions Act of 2006, a bill which suspended habeas corpus for any alien determined to be an "unlawful enemy combatant engaged in hostilities or having supported hostilities against the United States. In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States Congress passed a resolution known as the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) on 18 September 2001. In this, Congress invoked the War Powers Resolution and stated:

 

That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons

 

CIA thinks its foreign offshore assets are strong enough to defend against the US executive (not accounting for military use on domestic soil).

 

Not necessarily. Black budget, does not mean unlimited budget.

Why does the Constitution explicitly grant this authority to the President and what is it to prevent?

 

Allan Dulles knew even with full power, he was unable to find the moles which led to the “Moscow massacre”. The 1940’s Deep State knew that eventually the enemies of the USA and NATO would find a way into even the deepest citadel bunkers and there must be a necessary method to reboot the whole network in the event the Communist infection was impossible to contain or isolate from the SAPs & the corruption started to affect the “American dream”. There was legitimate concern that should the Mafia be purchased by a foreign power, or a foreign govt find a way to buy a POTUS, the Republic would be doomed and it would only be a matter of time before someone figured out how to defeat CIA/DIA’s failsafes and FBI’s counter programs

Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play.

 

George Soros established a pilot project of graduate students to study in a tailored course at the Soros Foundation-endowed Central European University in Budapest, jointly funded by UNDP and Soros.

 

'Humanitarianism' is the ruse by with Rothschilds deconstruct capitalism by usurping the banking system via Keynesian economics (also known as centralization). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/soros-woos-north-korea/106019.article#survey-answer

 

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2014/02/20/rothschilds-hidden-government-template-north-korea/

 

https://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/18/soros-carter-blame-bush-for-north-korea-crisis/

 

(SPECULATION) CIA

 

Two Strategic Intelligence Mistakes in Korea, 1950 - Perceptions and Reality https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/fall_winter_2001/article06.html https://archive.is/XOmj

 

Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.

SUMMARY

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 6:39 a.m. No.19194963   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5149

>>19194909

Illegal enemy combatants. Military Commissions Act of 2006, a bill which suspended habeas corpus for any alien determined to be an "unlawful enemy combatant engaged in hostilities or having supported hostilities against the United States

 

this is notable

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 7:02 a.m. No.19195073   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19194832 Retired Marine Gen. James Cartwright is the latest person being investigated into a leak last year that exposed an alleged cyber attack against Iran's nuclear system

notable

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 7:09 a.m. No.19195104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5107 >>5133 >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/spectre-michelle-obama-roger-stone-lays-terrifying-scenario/

 

The Spectre of Michelle Obama — Roger Stone Lays Out Frightening Scenario While Speaking to Turning Point USA

By Shawn Bradley Witzemann Jul. 17, 2023 8:30 am91 Comments

ROGER STONE MICHELLE OBAMA

Roger Stone says Michelle Obama will be the Democrat Presidential Nominee in 2024

A spectre is haunting the United States of America — the spectre of Michelle Obama.

 

Roger Stone broke the news on Sunday.

 

“As a veteran of many years in American politics, I’m going to tell you something somewhat shocking,” Stone told a full house at yesterday’s Turning Point USA event in Florida, “Joe Biden will not be the nominee of the Democratic Party in 2024.”

 

Stone said that while he expects Kamala Harris to serve a brief stint as President, her tenure wouldn’t be long lasting.

 

“The only way, in their (Democrat) party that they can replace a woman of color, is with another woman of color,” the genius of political strategy further explained.

 

“And yes, you heard it here first,” Stone prefaced while groans turned into a disgruntled roar from the Sunshine State crowd, “The democratic nominee for President will be Michelle Obama.”

 

Although some may find absurdity in the suggestion of another Obama presidency, it’s not like Barack hasn’t discussed the idea before, and Joe Biden’s dumpster fire administration makes even the most outlandish assessments seem realistic.

 

Much like the Marxist playbook we’ve seen time and again through history elsewhere in the world, the near entirety of our nation has been radicalized through an advanced progressive onslaught along with reactionary upheaval from adversarial forces in conservative America.

 

7 Reasons to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Premium Beef Right Away

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 7:09 a.m. No.19195107   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

>>19195104

Kamala Harris encourages the mobs in summer 2020

Just as it was in Europe, during the twilight years of the 19th century, the political stage in our divided union is now perfectly framed by two pillars of revolutionary necessity.

 

I. As illustrated by multiple opinion pieces in major publications such as “The Hill” in the last few months, Michelle Obama is already acknowledged by the entirety of the political landscape. In recognition of that fact, Democrat Party operatives continue to quietly float the idea of nominating the former First Lady for President.

 

II. It is a matter of inevitability that the radicalized Democrat party should allow the Obamas to once again step openly to the forefront of their stated agenda of fundamental transformation, and meet this “nursery tale” of the Spectre of Michelle Obama with blatant reality made manifest.

 

The Obamas are optimally poised for re-emergence.

 

If Roger Stone is as accurate as he sounds, “Red Scare” may be putting things mildly.

 

“They have already rigged their primaries,” Stone explained while laying out his near-tragic vision, “The reason that they have cancelled the Iowa Caucuses and the New Hampsire primary is to put South Carolina, a state where the majority of democrat primary voters are African Americans, and they will allow Gavin Newsom to purchase the Vice-Presidential nomination.”

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom has already shown what he’s willing to do for political gain

“But the Obamas will hold him up for six or eight hundred million dollars to do so,” Stone elaborated bluntly, “When Steve Bannon says it in three weeks remember I said it first.”

 

So, while certain compartments of the Republican Party continue to argue and ignore their constituents — looking for any reason to deny Donald J. Trump as his leadership position — the Marxist Democrat Spectre of a Michelle Obama Presidency becomes more possible with every passing day.

 

WATCH Roger Stone’s remarks HERE

I predict that Michelle Obama will be the Democrat Party Nominee for President in 2024.

 

You heard it here first.#ACTCON2023 @TPAction_ pic.twitter.com/AVqk36hmnh

 

— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) July 17, 2023

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/spectre-michelle-obama-roger-stone-lays-terrifying-scenario

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 7:11 a.m. No.19195110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5297 >>5467 >>5539

Donald J. Trump

 

@realDonaldTrump

 

IF I’M BEING PROSECUTED OVER DOCUMENTS, AND I SHOULDN’T BE IN THAT I COME UNDER THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, WHY IS JOE BIDEN NOT BEING PROSECUTED??? HE WAS EGREGIOUS!

 

 

71

 

ReTruths

 

253

 

Likes

Jul 17, 2023, 10:08 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110729817476332270

Anonymous ID: 882868 July 17, 2023, 7:26 a.m. No.19195167   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19195147

2131

[0:00]

Q

 

macevelli…

 

 

7/10.

Targeted Kills.

Power Out.

Flight re-routes.

Flight returns.

Running.

Public awakening.

Message spreading wide & far.

Goodbye @Jack.

Q