Review

==A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER

COVID-19 VACCINATION==

Abstract

Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19

vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to

concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle

(LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage,

thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this

systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19

vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to

COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies

and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained

325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently

reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct

cause or contributed significantly to death.

Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated

death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system

(17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or

more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to

death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine

administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as

directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.

Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known

COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death,

coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests

there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death

in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying

our findings.

Keywords: Autopsy; necropsy; COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccines; mRNA; SARS-

CoV-2 vaccination; death; excess mortality; spike protein; organ system

This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4496137

Preprint not peer reviewed

Nicolas Hulscher, BS 1*, Paul E. Alexander, PhD2, Richard Amerling, MD3,

Heather Gessling, MD3, Roger Hodkinson, MD3, William Makis, MD4, Harvey A.

Risch, MD, PhD5, Mark Trozzi, MD3, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH3 6

1University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2Former Senior Pandemic Advisor to A Secretary, Health and Human Services

(HHS, Washington, DC, former Assistant Professor in evidence-based medicine

and epidemiology, former WHO-PAHO COVID consultant (evidence synthesis;

present, advisor to The Wellness Company USA and Canada, Boca Raton, FL

3 Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL

4Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, 11560 University Avenue,

Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

5Professor Emeritus, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT

6Truth for Health Foundation, Tucson, AZ, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0997-6355

*Correspondence: nichulscher@gmail.com (Nicolas Hulscher)

Word Count: 2281

This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4496137

Preprint not peer reviewed

https://www.mccairndojo.com/library/sha1-ee481b7aad12da11e08c238ed570b81334d66981/Hulscher_McCullough_2023_LancetPrePrint_Vax_Autopsy_Review.pdf

-pre-print last about one week before RETRACTED –

LANCET used to be top flight journal - but after publishing the completely bogus anti-HCQ study in May 2020, NO LONGER:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7255293/

>>19195687

RESPONSE to RETRACTION of McCullough et al study on autopsy finding after CV19 vaccination

mainstream "science" and press trying hard to DOWNPLAY these results, but LOOK AT THE COMMENTS to the Yahoo HIT PIECE article.

Misinformation swirls around unpublished paper on Covid-19 vaccine risks

Fri, July 14, 2023 at 11:59 AM PDT·6 min read

Social media posts claim a paper attributing a high number of deaths to Covid-19 vaccines was suppressed from a major scientific journal. This is false; the preprint document was never accepted for publication by The Lancet, and the journal and independent experts said the research was flawed.

"74% OF COVID VACCINE AUTOPSY DEATHS WERE CAUSED BY THE VACCINE," claims text over a video shared on Instagram on July 9, 2023 by The Wellness Company, a "medical freedom" organization that sells supplements said to protect patients from "toxic spike proteins."

The same clip can be found on TikTok featuring one of the study's authors, Peter McCullough, an American cardiologist whom AFP has previously fact-checked for spreading misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines speaking to author Naomi Wolf, who has also shared inaccurate information about the shots.

Many posts claimed the research was published by The Lancet an established medical journal only to be removed after 24 hours, constituting "censorship."

"The Lancet is removing science that shows the COVID-19 'vaccines' are causing excess deaths," claims a July 10, 2023 tweet.

"They are erasing the truth from medical journals," a July 9 TikTok with more than 15,000 views claims.

The paper in question, "A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination" (archived here), was not published in The Lancet, but instead appeared on a preprint server associated with the journal where researchers can upload their work before it has received peer review.

According to its website, The Lancet collaborates with the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) to offer authors a dedicated preprint area called "Preprints with The Lancet" (archived here), but a study appearing on this server does not necessarily mean the journal is reviewing the paper.

The Lancet Group told AFP the paper was removed from the server because its conclusion was not supported by the methodology.

"Preprints with The Lancet on SSRN reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if it is determined that it has violated screening criteria," The Lancet Group said in a July 11 email.

The Lancet also says on its website that preprints are not meant to be used for clinical decision-making.

Sarah Everts, a professor of science journalism at Carleton University, said that while preprints are a common way of disseminating early scientific findings, the social media posts and articles claiming a paper proved Covid-19 vaccines have a high mortality rate are incorrectly describing the publication as thoroughly established science.

"They are conflating peer-reviewed research, which is about rigorously evaluated science, with a preprint server, which is something where scientists post their work while it is going through the peer review process," Everts said in an interview on July 11.

Everts said preprints are an important way for researchers to quickly release their work, but a paper needs to be evaluated by other experts to ensure the study's conclusions are well-founded and without error.

"Most science goes through peer review, which is getting people with very specific expertise to fine-pick through the paper or the study to make sure that everything parses," she said….

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/misinformation-swirls-around-unpublished-paper-185918429.html