>Despite controversy
Only controversial to pedophiles.
Weren't these the same idiots who said that individual day weather events LIKE THE COLDEST DAYS ON RECORD are not 'the climate' and anyone who extrapolates from individual day readings is an idiot?
"They" are panicking
It is 'profoundly misguided' to put porn and sexual grooming books in children's libraries.
Obama is pedo.
>the books that shaped my life
Bullshit these porn books were not in libraries when Obama was a child.
A message is neither true nor false based on the background of the author.
By your logic we should start to doubt 2+2=4 because tyrannical dictators said it.
Follow the $$$$
Yes, follow the money in child trafficking itself.
>you fail to understand that anon is supporting that
How do you know that? In truth Anon isn't concerned whether you personally support it or not.
Just saying, all the narrative about focusing on one AMONG MANY financiers of the movie, Anon doesn't care.
There are GOOD people who financed the movie, what about them? What about those 'digs'? Why not 'ADD' those?
It's like saying "Did you know out of all the people who said 2+2=4, one of them was Hitler? You should question 2+2=4 now."
Bingo.
Ergo clown assets in media all in unison all in coordination all the same exact catchphrases to discredit.
"Qanon adjacent"
"Conspiracy"
Etc
>bc they do not specifically expose the entirety of the network in one name like Carlos Slim does.
Neither does merely echoing what Ballard said about ONE AMONG MANY financiers of the movie!
You're not exposing the entire network merely by echoing Ballard in that interview.
I think the whole Slim narrative is a slide to distract from the CIA.
>Slim opens the door to the C_A.
It does? How? You have sauce linking the two?
>What are you arguing about?
Nothing, just replying to replies that are for whatever reason rather aggressive and disagreeing about what Anon isn't even saying, which is tantamount to arguing itself.
Slim is a slide away from the clowns.
Q+ retruthed a post calling out the CIA as running THE LARGEST child trafficking oop in the world.
"You fail to understand", etc.
So you're just asserting with no sauce, and covering that up with reversing the burden of proof and feigning ignorance at anyone who doesn't agree?
Maybe you're right maybe I'm wrong
What isn't?
So you figured out that your own copypasta attack on swordy, which increments your own counter, isn't credible, so deftly switch to dumb AI generation?
>An online persona
Nope, it's just Anon. The haters are the source of the 'namefag' narrative.
>>19200069. ←This is a clown trying to associate anti-pedophilia with nazis, fascism and anti-semitism, in order to create a COVER to protect the pedophiles.
Special place in hell.
No, want sauce because then can BENEFIT FROM IT by using it to persuade normies.
But you keep going with acting all huffy and offended at being asked for sauce, totally not revealing at all.
>>19200097 ← HONK HONK
Look who the cat dragged in
>same poster trying to discredit Sound of Freedom uses the muh joo (antisemitism) weapon. lol.
YOUare doing exactly that you schizophrenic bag of clown shit.
Nice IP hop