>>19205745

>Imagine right now you publish something that is unwanted by certain parties. How would you host that content yourself, when tons want to access it over a regular internet connection?

>How would you protect your own computers from attacks? DDoS?

>How would you protect yourself from being knocked out forever because someone simply fills up your internet connection?

you will see. It's fucking glorious. encryption, sharing, redundancy, distributed routing, etc. Sybil is more of an issue that DDoS, but even that becomes meaningless at scale and cost. DDoS needs a target. There is no target here. It's been in development for over 20 years. This isn't some fucking shitshow crypto project.

>>19205754

>But how do you protect such an infrastructure from illegal content?

>Is ever node supposed to check all the content?

>Or do you go "doesn't matter, even when it's illegal content"? The authorities will care.

>That's why hosting an exit node in certain countries is a really stupid idea.

Exit nodes ARE the user, not some IP. Illegal content? Tough question. Discussed widely and deeply. A.I. will play a role in this. Backdoors and old ideas are not an option. Understand WTF we are up against.

>>19204259 /lb

>bitcoin is like digital fed notes, but worse.

>you get no liability what-so-ever, it's all your responsibility, which is fair for metals, because you can protect metals by yourself. You CAN NOT secure electronic devices by yourself.

>You pay PER TRANSACTION.

>You understand what this means?

>Pay cash or pay with card.

>What's better?

>Pay cash obviously, because "the bank" doesn't get part of the transaction.

>When you pay with card, "the bank" gets a certain percentage over and over, and thus the money goes to the bank after a few transactions, which is ridiculous.

>Centralized ledger with all your transactions in it.

>You need

>- electricity

>- their internet

>- electronic gadgets (can't create these yourself)

>- software, that you trust

>- firmware, that you trust

>It's a shit idea.

>Finally you do not solve the property tax problem with this anyway. So nothing really changes, that's why governments have no real problems allowing this.

>Their primary goal is to get rid of cash, and you do that by pushing bitcoin, as if it would solve ANYTHING and wouldn't make the situation WORSE.

Over the last 100 years, the dollar has lost almost all of its value. I you think that you don't pay a fee for using FED notes, you're a fucking idiot. That's the most expensive monetary system the US has or will ever have. They've stolen the wealth of our nation, dipshit. Bitcoin fees recycle through the system to pay for energy use=infrastructure. Some people here are loving hardened patriots, but they're also fucking dumb uneducated rednecks who know jack shit about tech and economics. Stay in your lane.