Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 1:28 p.m. No.19207332   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7362 >>7405 >>7424 >>7432 >>7896

Shapley: Since I made these protected disclosures, that are legally protected, the IRS has chosen to retaliate against me in multiple ways..my immediate supervisor, and two levels above him, haven't spoken to me since June 1st of 2023, even though I am sending them emails and trying to conduct my business on a daily basis.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 1:31 p.m. No.19207354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7424 >>7432 >>7896

Ziegler: I essentially made disclosures up to the Commissioner of the IRS [Daniel Werfel], I said what happened, and the response I got a few days later was I, 'may have broken the law', and 'don't ever do this again. Your emails need to go through your leadership.'

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 1:33 p.m. No.19207376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7424 >>7432 >>7896

Frost: Since January 6th, these republicans and Trump have complained about a two-tiered justice system, co-opting the language of the decades-long civil rights movement for black lives and black freedom. A movement that they are actually looking to eliminate.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 1:47 p.m. No.19207473   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7483 >>7488

The chairman of these hearings need to be able to, like a judge, ask those speaking 'where they are going with this', and be able to cut them off if they are simply grandstanding nonsense that is unrelated to the subject of the hearing.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 2:02 p.m. No.19207574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Donalds: Is it a clear line of potential investigation if somebody [Hunter] is charging up massive living expenses through a corporate account, and not doing that through their own personal accounts, and accounting for that properly on their income tax returns? Is that the basis of a criminal investigation?

Shapley: Generally speaking, that would definitely be factors that would spur a criminal investigation, yes.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 2:06 p.m. No.19207616   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7623

Donalds: I think it is the view of members on this committee, and frankly a lot of Americans at this point, that there are elements at the Department of Justice who did not want this information out, who did not want to go down the line of actually going through the evidence gathering process, to see the depths to which this international pay-for-play scheme was actually happening around Joe Biden, going through Hunter Biden, and all the money that the Biden Family was incurring.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 2:27 p.m. No.19207745   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Crockett: The insinuation that this committee is trying to make, or at least one side of this committee is trying to make, is that for some reason there was interference, and my colleagues continue to make sure they outline the fact that this investigation actually started under the Trump administrationโ€ฆat the end of the day, we have no evidence whatsoever that [Joe Biden] or the attorney general of the United States interfered.

[that they both interfered is a guarantee]

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 2:37 p.m. No.19207825   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

LaTurner: You stated in public interviews that you and your team were stopped from taking certain investigative steps that you believe could have, potentially, connected this Hunter Biden case to [Joe Biden]. Is that correct?

Shapley: That's correct.

Anonymous ID: 4f1571 July 19, 2023, 2:40 p.m. No.19207850   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

LaTurner: We have two credible, non-partisan IRS investigators, confirming that there are millions of dollars in foreign payments to shell companies, to the Biden administration. We have Hunter Biden, who most of us wouldn't hire to dog-sit, receiving these millions of dollars for services that they cannot come forward and tell us about. And potentially this is linked to [Joe Biden], but we don't know that for a fact because you were shut down. You were not allowed to pursue the investigative angle you wanted to.