Anon does not resent or struggle with existing as a mortal being subject to the temporal process, of having a bodily birth and then death.
To have been born at all, let alone born as a human being with the capacity to reflect on self and all others, is a miraculous gift.
No you don't, if you really did you'd end your life instead of posting to QR.
No you don't, because you could end your life without any suffering.
Google it, Anon isn't going to help too much, just know that every day you wake up and decide not to end your life, you choose to live and there is no real empirical performative preference to not live.
What WOULD the empirical evidence have to look like of it had looked as though you were voluntarily existing and not suiciding yourself?
If you can't answer that, then your usage of the phrase 'empirical evidence' is just empty wordplay
>despite being dismissed as QAnon conspiracy fodder
Kek, BY WHO?
The same central coordinating intelligence that sent 4am talking points to a number of infiltrated media, which logically must be the case because they all parroted the exact same talking points. True independent orgs don't do that, mathematically by probability.
[cough…CIA…cough]
It's just one wrap up smear wheel of self-referential justification. Send 4am talking point to infiltrated media, then reference those media as demonstrating that 'It's largely dismissed', as if it's an organic consensus driven outcome.
Sauce and date please.
https://theresearchrabbitwhole9-11edition.blogspot.com/2016/07/operation-mockingbird-art-of-deception.html
Your definition of empirical evidence is 'what I feel'?
Well that's redefining the phrase.
>It would look like me feeling like existing on earth 2023 is worth it. It‘s not
Your actions contradict your words again and again.
Other Anon was right, your problem is your mindset. It's full of inconsistencies.
Q never said 'religion is part of the illusion.'
Q was pointing out a hypocrisy, an infiltration of churches.
Look at the all caps: "IT GOES A LOT DEEPER'
You introduced the phrase empirical evidence, not me, so you can't then feign incredulity.
There are many people in the world a lot worse off than you, you should not complain so much.
>They want you divided by religion
>Religion is inherently divisive
If religion were really 'inherently divisive' (it isn't), then there would be no need for 'them' to spend trillions, time, energy and resources infiltrating religions to prompt a division that is already supposedly there.
"they" would have just sat back and did nothing.
What you're trying to do is persuade Anons of a falsehood, that religion is 'inherently divisive'.
Religion is not the opposite of being open minded, it is logically consistent with it. To spend money, time and energy infiltrating religions, while simultaneously telling everyone just forget about God, THAT is closed mindedness that only survives when people trust the messages that come out of it. The infiltration dies when people use discernment.
The ultimate closed mindedness is believing that everything humanity has written and spoken about God over the millennia, is somehow 'really' a phenomena of human beings, aka THE HUMAN POSTULATING IT, is somehow the real God.
This meme encapsulates what is in fact an ancient, pre-Enlightenment, pre-Industrial Age cult-like mental freeze.
>Call Anon Jews
>Smear Jews worldwide
>Label living people Jews
>Jews are all dead.
Inconsistency in the shill logic.
Stop posting. You're gobbling up the bread. You're already at 47 posts.