sup ya'll
> The myth that Jews use the blood of Christian children in rituals
The Pope Who Tried To Cheat Death By Drinking The Blood Of Children
https://www.ranker.com/list/pope-innocent-viii-child-blood-transfusion/carly-silver
This 15th-century Pontifex is best known not as the failed ruler he was – not for his edicts against witches and magicians nor for his slave ownership – but as the Pope who drank blood in an attempt to cure an ailment.
When he suffered a stroke and slipped into a coma, Innocent's doctor decided to conduct the first recorded blood transfusion in history, giving his patient little boys' blood to sip on. Unfortunately for Innocent, just because he received the first known blood transfusion doesn't mean he received the first successful one. It is recorded that he and the children whose lifeblood he consumed died shortly after the macabre procedure.
The man behind the oral blood transfusion suggestion seems to have been Innocent's Jewish physician, a guy named Giacomo di San Genesio. He'd previously cured Innocent of bouts of fever. In this recounting of the events around Innocent's blood consumption, the association of a Jewish physician with draining blood from Christians suggests that this entire procedure might have been a farce. Heinous anti-Semitic propaganda suggested that Jews sacrificed Christian babies for evil rites or for health purposes, so charging Innocent's Jewish physician with this kind of bloodlust could have been used to propagandistic ends.
The man behind the oral blood transfusion suggestion seems to have been Innocent's Jewish physician, a guy named Giacomo di San Genesio. He'd previously cured Innocent of bouts of fever. In this recounting of the events around Innocent's blood consumption, the association of a Jewish physician with draining blood from Christians suggests that this entire procedure might have been a farce. Heinous anti-Semitic propaganda suggested that Jews sacrificed Christian babies for evil rites or for health purposes, so charging Innocent's Jewish physician with this kind of bloodlust could have been used to propagandistic ends.
https://www.ranker.com/list/pope-innocent-viii-child-blood-transfusion/carly-silver
1st acknowledged, attempted 'blood transfusion' was a pope drinking 3 kids' blood. FFS. As if it was a dice roll, and not a KNOWN practice.
Blood Lust: The Early History of Transfusion
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/blood-lust-the-early-history-of-transfusion/
By some accounts, the first transfusion was performed on Pope Innocent VIII in 1492; some claimed that he was transfused with or—at the very least—had drunk the blood of Jewish boys.
History of Blood Transfusion
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-8435-0_9
The first documented references go to Ovid who wrote in 43 BC in the seventh book of the Metamorphoses about the use of blood. The ancient kings of Egypt apparently bathed in blood, with the belief such baths can resuscitate the sick and rejuvenate the old. In 1492, blood was taken from three young men and given to the stricken Pope Innocent VII in the hope of curing him. It is the first time a blood transfusion was recorded.
Blood Transfusion in 1492
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/453848
The Story of a Blood Transfusion to a Pope
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24619486
>Someone has to build the new schools.
they must be so proud for having built a house of horrors and pain for a demon, eh?
foreign NGO 'interest' in third world nations = human harvesting.
of course the locals knew.
Psalm 18:11
He made darkness his secret place; his pavilion round about him were dark waters and thick clouds of the skies.
locals know foreigner intent, based on first hand observation, and historical account from family and community. worldwide. this shit aint new.
you are a buffoon to think that the colonized do not grasp the history and intent of the colonizers/harvesters.
they knew and know that rich foreigners and 'aid organizations' are not there to help but to prey. why is this so hard to accept? this is the same the world over.
gene wilder playing pedo roald dahl's slave owning willy wonka is a strange pic to infuse here though.
good day
no one said they know of her then what we know now, anon stated that locals know that foreign $ and aid is the opposite of what it presents itself as. always. and you know this.
winning? not playing. stating facts you ignore.
> a great guy
UBI
transhumanism
merge w/ AI
total planetary surveillance
slave extracted battery elements
etc…
if any public facing figure is a full blown humandroid or transhuman or cybord or synth or other technological abomination, Elon musk Is the prime candidate.
elon means oak tree
musk means essence or scent of
essence of an oak tree? like a cask, cooper, or otherwise empty vessel, void of spirit. Spirits get inserted into and are thus housed in in oak casks. They are not born there. Empty vessels awaiting a passenger(s), spirit(s).
The US Mil's #1 private contractor representative, Elon Musk
Boring Co
SpaceX
Starlink
Neuralink
Tesla
CureVac
OpenAI
xAI
and the only company in the world that is not a bank, but is allowed to operate as a bank, paypal
Sophia and Boston Dynamics products are not the height of quantumAi enabled humandroid technology, to be sure. They are not classified lest we would not be aware of them FFS
"they knew and know that rich foreigners and 'aid organizations' are not there to help but to prey. why is this so hard to accept? this is the same the world over. "
"locals know foreigner intent, based on first hand observation, and historical account from family and community. worldwide. this shit aint new."
"foreign NGO 'interest' in third world nations = human harvesting.
of course the locals knew."
"they must be so proud for having built a house of horrors and pain for a demon, eh?"
Clown. nowhere did anon say they knew then about oprah what we know now.
fuck off.