>Jew Satanists
Oxymoron
Agreed, it's the panicking muhjoos covering for the Satanists by trying to use 17 million people as human shields.
Did you know millions upon millions upon millions of Jews have 0% control over any media whatsoever?
Let's ignore the Colombians trafficking women and children in Colombia.
Let's also ignore the CIA trafficking women and children.
Let's all ignore all of that, and instead protect the satanic cult by using 17 million people as human shields.
>Normies do not give 2 fucks about Hunter / Joe
You misspelled 'fake news refuses to show their declining normie audience while the overwhelming majority of the country is awake.
Wokeism is also anti-orthodox Jew.
Take a chill pill, muhjoo, or you'll give yourself an aneurysm.
Anon prefers not to post gore.
At least you could come up with a better 'comeback', muhjoo.
"Now don’t mistake the Talmud saying “if an adult man has relations with a very young girl” with permission to do so; it’s merely saying what the legal upshot is should the situation occur, which, sadly, it has. We also discuss what happens if a person commits manslaughter and what happens if one person shoves forbidden fats down another person’s throat, among many other scenarios. That’s not to permit all of these activities, it’s just to discuss the consequences of various things that might happen.
You’re also probably assuming that the person who rapes a toddler does so with impunity, but such is not the case. Sexual assault is assault, for which there are penalties. We know that; it’s a given. It’s just not what the Talmud is discussing here, which is determining virginity vis-à-vis a dowry.
Similarly, the statement that it’s “permitted” to have sex with a child under the age of nine is out of context. That’s from Sanhedrin 54b and it refers specifically to a boy. In terms of efficacy of the sexual act, a boy up to age nine is like a girl up to age three: it’s “nothing” in the sense that it doesn’t count as sex in halacha. This doesn’t mean that it’s permitted, nor does it mean that there are no consequences. (Again, it’s still assault.) It just means that for the purpose of halachos involving sex, it’s not sex." - Rabbi Jack Abramowitz
Nice try pedo-adjacent shill.
The whole 'pro' 'anti' dialectic to form human shields isn't going to save the satanic pedo cult.
>You’re also probably assuming that the person who rapes a toddler does so with impunity, but such is not the case. Sexual assault is assault, for which there are penalties. We know that; it’s a given. It’s just not what the Talmud is discussing here, which is determining virginity vis-à-vis a dowry.
Sauce pls
So by your logic 'it's the whites' because the Bidens committed treason.
Your logic says to hold innocent people as guilty through guilt by association.
That's the same inconsistent logic.
Blame the jews when one jew is indicted.
Don't blame the whites when a Biden is indicted because they're just puppets.
It's old and stale.
You just contradicted yourself, and you contradicted your own memes.
>not all
How can it be 'the jews' when there are millions of innocent jews.
And now you're telling Anon to trust Jews as speaking truth?
Moran.
Christian Kabbalah or Jewish Kabbalah?
>When 2% of the population is responsible formostof the creepy crawler crimes
Pretty suremostchild sex trafficking is done by the C_A.
Who you are trying to protect with muhjoo shield defense.
Oh don't worry, Anons know the clown memes trigger you pedo adjacent bastards.
>>19233068 ← Panic panic panic
You pedo adjacent clown shills must be shitting your pants.
You're projecting, you disgusting panicking pedo adjacent shill.
And it's not 'the jews' attacking Trump, it's globalist cult controlled fake news media and orgs protecting themselves with muhjoo.
As are you.
You're terrible at lying, pedo adjacent shill.
Tick tock.
No amount of muhjoo shielding yourself will stop what is coming.
Another lie.
Pedo adjacent shill, your entire 59 post vomiting here was nothing but one giant pedophile protecting distraction.
Honk honk.
Oh here comes the 'consensus crack' fellatio support.
That would be equivalent 'defend the satanic cult' shilling, pedo-adjacent shill.
>But I'm not defending the Satanic Cult called the Jews
That right there IS defending the satanic pedophile cult, pedo adjacent shill.