Anonymous ID: 9af6e1 June 27, 2018, 8:49 a.m. No.1924811   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4844 >>4874 >>4882

>>1924704

My understanding is he was not fired because as an employee, he can be compelled to testify, which isn't the case as a civilian, BUT, if NOT under oath, what is the point? why bother w/ the whole charade of his testimony? this isn't a case of Swamp being stupid, it's OUR side โ€ฆ. Dragging it out, bringing people in w/o putting under oathโ€ฆ it's pointless.

 

WHY ARE THEY COMPELLING TESTIMONY W /O OATH? IT'S LITERALLY GIVING HIM PERMISSION TO LIE HIS ASS OFF. (Stzrok)