If you worked for Mossad and over the last 30 years you bought off and blackmailed and now controlled all of the US politicians.
Would you want term limits, so the politicians you control are removed every 4 years?
Would you want more than 2 party's that you worked your ass off to control?
With more than 2 party's you would have to work harder to control them, no one wants to work harder than they have to..
At some point legacy media and social media decided they wished to push the narrative that covid was real and incredibly deadly and that a huge amount of people would die from it and there was nothing sneaky going on. The message was just: a black plague-like pandemic has arrived, and that’s it, governments have no agenda here other than saving lives.
So it was endlessly stressed that people should listen to experts. The media cherry-picked and promoted those experts who pushed the desired message. The media deplatformed genuine experts and scientists and doctors who contradicted the desired message.
The media thereby created an illusion that like 99.99% of experts agreed with the narrative, when in reality that percentage was substantially lower. That percentage would have been even lower, had experts not been threatened with the loss of their job or funding if they contradicted the official narrative.
And of course, if 99.99% of experts agree on something (they didn’t), then it’s fair to censor misinformation, right? But it was never the case that 99.99% of experts agreed.
Keep in mind that just because the media pretends that practically every expert agrees on something, doesn’t mean that’s actually so. They’re simply lying. They pretend that there’s an expert consensus when in reality that doesn’t exist, and then they fabricate the perception of that consensus by selectively deplatforming and censoring experts who go against the desired narrative.
This is a critical point. Always remember that when the media implies or states that there’s some expert consensus here, almost never are they actually proving that this alleged consensus exists. Sure, sometimes this consensus really does exist, but sometimes it doesn’t and they’re just fabricating it out of thin air. And then they’re reinforcing their fabrication via the deplatforming of experts who disagree with them.
This is actually an incredibly powerful tool to fabricate reality. The masses think that the media is just some party passing along information, when in reality the media can very easily get most of the population to believe that reality is whatever they fabricate it to be.
This is similar to how people think that polls are a way to measure public opinion, when in reality polls are often a way to fabricate public opinion. After all, you can make polls say whatever you wish, just by oversampling people who agree with your desired opinion. Or in plain English: if five people agree with you and five people disagree with you, and you take a poll among four people who agree and one person who disagrees with you, then the poll will say that 80% of people agree with you.
If the average person believes that most people believe something, then they will believe it too. If the average person believes that most people favor X over Y, then probably this person will favor X too, even if it was never true that most people favored X. Therefore most people can be nudged to believe X, because they believe that most people believe X, when in reality they never did. But then the poll appears accurate afterwards, because the poll said that most people prefer X and indeed most people now prefer X. But most people only prefer X because the poll initially lied about most people preferring X. Therefore the poll didn’t measure reality, the poll fabricated reality.
In fact, the poll fabricated reality so well that the poll made up that most people prefer X, and because of the power of the poll, most people now genuinely do prefer X. Because they think most others prefer X, when they never did before the poll fabricated that reality.
In this way, one poll can change the opinion of millions of people, just by convincing the masses that a majority opinion among the people exists, when it doesn’t.
Is your head spinning? Yes, from the perspective of the dark controllers, reality really is this malleable. The herd of sheep really are this easy to herd into a slaughterhouse.
Suppose the dark controllers wish to sabotage a political candidate in the minds of the public, or wish to convince a political candidate that they can’t win and should drop out of the race. Then the dark controllers can use skewed polls that oversample people who disagree with those candidates. This sounds silly, but it’s actually effective, because the public doesn’t want to promote or talk about or volunteer for or donate to candidates if the polls show they have no chance. It’s also much harder for a political campaign to secure funding if they poll poorly. This is why there’s sometimes talk that a certain political candidate may be beloved, but they’re simply not viable. In part they’re not viable because they’re being sabotaged by skewed polls from the dark controllers. Funnily enough, the candidates that the dark controllers like are always viable and are usually polling well, even when most people despise those candidates
The dark controllers also tried this during the 2016 Trump vs Hillary election. Polls usually predicted that Hillary would win, but then Trump won. So the polls weren’t accurate, as is often the case, however in this case they failed to manufacture the reality they were allegedly predicting, and so the polls were exposed in this instance. However most people failed to realize the significance of this exposure, and so today most people still believe polls. This is a shame: in an ideal world people would have stopped believing in polls after 2016, or even earlier.
Intentionally skewed polls are also a great method to cover up election manipulation. If election results are in line with poll results, then the election doesn’t look manipulated, however often in the west it’s the case that the elections and the polls were simply both manipulated.
Polls aren’t tools to measure public opinion. They’re tools to fabricate public opinion.
At least, they are whenever the dark controllers wish to push a certain narrative. Of course there are people out there who genuinely do good polling, with a reasonable sampling. Some polls are reasonably accurate.
So the media and polls can fabricate whatever reality they want, and most of the public will believe that this fabricated reality is actual reality.
Unfortunately, this pattern of fabricating false realities has been repeating over and over and over again. For example, the media fabricated a false reality that inflation would be transitory. The media fabricated a false reality that Russia would lose the Ukraine war. The media fabricated a false reality that invading Iraq was an appropriate response to 9/11. Et cetera, et cetera.
How often does the media need to fabricate a false reality before the masses stop listening to them?