>>19248806 pb
it was just one data point,
among many.
And you can't show a death certi either, can you? You just like to throw shade.
Wasn't in the death index.
Seems she isn't dead.
What a coincidence.
I will admit, even if she WAS in the death index, it wouldn't prove she was dead.
But the fact she is not in it, as in many other cases of death fakery, kinda lends weight to the idea that she's still alive.
I tend to believe it was death fakery because they reward their operatives who do a good job and if they killed them after, maybe they'd have less people who want to work for them?
But otherwise, they kill, apparently, with aplomb - and do like to get rid of witnesses.
The death index issue was poisoned around the 9/11 evidence. Lots of SNOPES-style "debunking" so I actually think the ss death index is good evidence.
>>19248840 pb
Obama's ss from CT is from Newtown Mental Hospital ; it's a stolen ss - not from his mother being from CT - which I doubt anyway.
picrel
>>19248844 pn
IMO, reading the transcript, somehow the congressional questioner believed Baker wrote, or helped to write, the Memos; which btw have never yet surfaced.
How many writings did they do? The transcript mentions memos, in plural
If, in the transcript Baker denies exactly writing them, he admits to helping in their structuring, as in being a sounding board for their drafting.
Why would he have to do that for Comey. Didn't Comey just write it up after the meeting?
Seems there was a little fictionalization involved.
The memos are by definition very one sided, right? It's just Comey's word / impression.
DJT dropped the idea that the encounter was taped.
Maybe Trump fucked-up their plans as he did with retaining the telephone conversation transcript with Zalensky?
The memos weren't just written from Comey's memory - per this interview. They were crafted.