Anonymous ID: 7c6db0 July 29, 2023, 4:24 p.m. No.19264961   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19264887

#3766

 

orensicatorโ€™s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rateโ€”the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNCโ€™s server. The operation took87seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/