tyb
RFK Jr knows the DNC knows he isn't going to be given the nomination for D party.
So question is why is RFK Jr running as D candidate.
Anon opine: Q+ / RFK Jr ticket would not only make strategic sense, it would be beautifully symbolic and align the plan.
RFK Jr getting simultaneously attacked by the legacy media, by the entire D Party, by the pharma complex, is all the more evidence he SHOULD run alongside Q+, and together they can take down the same criminal network that murderer RFK Jr's dad and uncle.
Hey look it's the projecting echo chamber shill, seething and here to deflect and distract once again.
Nice fallacy of composition, pedo adjacent shill.
Now do all the non-Jewish names Q dropped. Oh that's right, you won't, because by your own unironic use of collectivist logic, it would have to be EVERY 'the [every background]'.
So you instead implement an inconsistently applied fallacy of composition. Fallacy of composition for muhjoo, no such fallacy for everyone else.
>Is it a smear if it's true?
The deep state's smears already been proved false.
The entire deep state complex is attacking RFK Jr with the same pattern as they do on Q+.
RFK Jr is a threat to the swamp.
>RFK Jr. Has a major case of TDS, have you even listened to him speak?
Yes, have heard him speak. Still think it would be a good ticket.
>>19273388
Yes this is one such deep state smear they use to attack RFK Jr. They use the same smear against Q+.
>>19273417
You just proved Anon's point.
Omit all the non-Jew names.
>>19273425
The plan is surrounded by good and evil on all 'sides'.
>>19273435
>How can it be WWG1WGA if you Jews won't join us antisemites?
How can it be WWG1WGA when you experience your own inner divided psychology of self-alienation, and rather than take responsibility for it, you instead blame the world thereby INTRODUCING division within humanity according to the very logic you just wrote?
What you're doing is spewing a dialectic of inconsistencies, as if you're speaking about the world and not your own psychology.
Translation: "I'm triggered you're not a tool of the fake news' wrap up smear campaign like me, so I'll project and accuse you of what I am doing."
>Meta projection: when your projection involves claiming that someone is projecting.
Kek, you wrote it.
>Who worships Satan?All Religions which require a Satan,
You mad, you trying to defend the cult by blaming the source material the cult is trying to 'negate'.
You need to identify a projected 'need' for Satan, huh?
>And who was claiming that the other was projecting
Before or after you said I was projecting here?:
Kek
"Make shoes targeting young people with imagery of baphomet, without using the imagery of baphomet."
"Make coffee targeting young people with imagery of baphomet, without using the imagery of baphomet."
Infiltration not invasion.
Did you 'determine' I was projecting before or after I determined you were projecting?
>you started claiming that I was projecting… I told you that your accusation sounded a lot like projection i.e. Meta projection
Yes, and then I called THAT a projection of your own projection.
Ask whether what I initially replied to:
Was really IN FACT about me, or you.
I know the answer.
I didn't say you were projecting in THAT latest post.
I referenced the history of posts prior.
This post:
I correctly determined you were projecting.
Thanks for playing.
>Don't have to, I wrote it
>omg you're projecting
Kek, you just labelled your own posts as projections.
Kek, you wrote it again.
>mental gymnastics
Did that take place before or after I determined you were projecting here:
After which you've been trying mental gymnastics since in order to project that onto Anon?
Kek