I couldn't care less.
I'm no angel. Nor am I anyone to look to for inspiration. I just help hold the line here by the permission of everyone else on the line. I am just a cog in the machine, easily replaced.
Ah, so I see you're trying to butter me up now. Trying to inflate my ego so you can, what, crush it later? An experiment perhaps? Not going to work. Ever. Your AI generated poetry that you love to direct daily towards me is as fake as you are. Fuck off, faggot. Go post your regular propaganda rather than attacking the trivialities of one single Anon.
They criticize the personal trivialities of a single Anon
I criticize their evil narratives, their method of delivery, and slap around the messengers of those narratives for fun.
People can judge for themselves who the bad guy is. I've put my time in and need to convince no one where my heart lies.
They're attempting to inflate the egos of Anons this week. For what I have no clue nor concern. Heads up. Armor on. Give these bastards no ground.
Attempting to disarm with praise and kindness. It's too bad for them that there's no feel of authenticity to the undertone of their words.
Spamming the catalog so that another country's bread gets deleted is you trying to get me to "tone it down?" You do realize your gaslighting is even weaker than your spam attempts, do you not?
Moar AI poetry to mask the inadequacy of your failure, please.
So when you claimed to be responsible for taking down Swordy and Sam a month or so ago, what was your reasoning behind that statement? Because, uh, I still see them posting daily, one giving a daily blessing and one wishing everyone a good morning. Evil messages that need to be taken down, huh? You're fake.
>>19274494
I remember when that fucktard claimed to know who Q was and had the chatlogs to prove it. Still waiting on those chatlogs, Piece-of-Shit-biec. Wasn't he also the one behind dragging Milo and Ye to have dinner with POTUS that the media tried creating a controversy around?
Obsequiousness, how quaint. So, because other people started writing "God bless you and keep you from hard, this day and forever," that justifies a crusade to try and take down the person who says that daily, huh? I love how you shitheads use the search engine to design attacks around keywords that you search for and try building your narratives/attacks around. You can pretend to be an innocent, God fearing Anon all you want; your past behavior tells a different story than the mask you're wearing this week.
"PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO COPY SAYING GOD BLESS YOU AND KEEP YOU FROM HARM! SHUT IT DOWN AT ALL COSTS! DESTROY WHO POSTS THAT!"
That seriously was the argument presented just now, not verbatim, but the gist. Baffling at how stupid they are sometimes.
Using AI poetry… to gaslight now… Those poor fucking bastards. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I'm not Pig either. I am me. Some call me asshole, some call me faggot, some called me Cardigan, some still call me SmokingPepe. It's less about responding to the name and moar about responding based upon who the words are directed and the undertone. If it's blatantly obvious if they're talking about me they can call me a goddamn titmouse for all I care, I will still respond with both barrels aimed.
I have the same MO as Pig, huh? So every meme I make has the phrase America Winning and is signed SmokingPepe, huh? What makes what I do the same MO as Pig, Sherlock? Go ahead and explain it, I'm interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.
When they're focused on me, or other Anons, they're not posting MuhJoo. Strange coincidence that the MuhJoo posting dries up when they decide to be brave and go toe to toe with Anons.
You cocksuckers think I wanted to become a target for the shills? No, I didn't, but I don't exactly find it uncomfortable either. Moar of a curiosity to be explored than anything negative. Sometimes the research that is done here is personal.
Ah, when they still reply after they've been filtered. It's the little REEEEEs that make me smile.
>…By the way you keep posting, yes.
Just because I didn't want it, doesn't mean I didn't embrace it.
>>19274766 (me; edit: addendum)
Because it's not my memes or my words that trigger the shills, it's become my mere presence now. I defy the "rules of being Anon" that they tried to force on the board last year, that they tried forcing on the board earlier this year. Displaying any form of individuality is a crime to them, and one that warrants taking down the poster than dared to be an individual in what is supposed to be an anonymous collective hivemind.
>Everyone who loves children, by definition, is a pedophile.
There's a pretty big difference between loving a child paternally/maternally and wanted your dick in its hand to facilitate an orgasm, you fucking piece of shit. Your idea of sex is not love.
Non sequitur conclusion jumping. You're a fucking hero.
It's a blanket term the shills throw out. It means nothing. It's how they cope when Anons make them look bad and they have no regular ammunition to counter with.
I think I'll do some painting.