Anonymous ID: fa2375 July 31, 2023, 10:50 a.m. No.19274160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4176

>>19274083 (lb)

>there are always exceptions.

So what you're saying is, it's not that the person is dead that makes it "wrong" to speak ill of them. But the fact that you like the person being spoken ill about that makes it "wrong".

Gotcha.

Anonymous ID: fa2375 July 31, 2023, 10:59 a.m. No.19274205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4244

>>19274198

And you know for a fact that pee wee didn't fit those criteria?

Just admit it, your rule is retarded and your exception shows that you only apply your rule selectively yourself.

Anonymous ID: fa2375 July 31, 2023, 11:07 a.m. No.19274256   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19274244

My issue isn't with who you want to speak ill of or not retard…

The issue is your hallmonitoring behaviour when anons don't follow your arbitrary and retarded rules.

Kek

>enough,

enough what? enough dying on hill you can't defend?

Anonymous ID: fa2375 July 31, 2023, 12:16 p.m. No.19274620   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19274608

>If just a joke, why get so upset over another making a joke about that joke?

Faggot, you called me a pedo…

That's no joke. Especially not here.

How fucking retarded are you?