>>19274083 (lb)
>there are always exceptions.
So what you're saying is, it's not that the person is dead that makes it "wrong" to speak ill of them. But the fact that you like the person being spoken ill about that makes it "wrong".
Gotcha.
>>19274083 (lb)
>there are always exceptions.
So what you're saying is, it's not that the person is dead that makes it "wrong" to speak ill of them. But the fact that you like the person being spoken ill about that makes it "wrong".
Gotcha.
Then what makes an exception?
And you know for a fact that pee wee didn't fit those criteria?
Just admit it, your rule is retarded and your exception shows that you only apply your rule selectively yourself.
My issue isn't with who you want to speak ill of or not retard…
The issue is your hallmonitoring behaviour when anons don't follow your arbitrary and retarded rules.
Kek
>enough,
enough what? enough dying on hill you can't defend?
Playing both sides as always…
Check timestamps. It's easy to see.
If they gonna bring in the aliens.
At least let me fuck one.
If it has a hole I'm all in
>Sounds like a possible pedo there.
Fuck you, don't go through around such accusations over a fucking joke…
>If just a joke, why get so upset over another making a joke about that joke?
Faggot, you called me a pedo…
That's no joke. Especially not here.
How fucking retarded are you?
>Had to give em something to make hem feel better.
Nah… you tried to sound smart and you blew it.
Better luck next time.
Multiple UIDs. Same script