Anonymous ID: 3fab66 July 31, 2023, 7:58 p.m. No.19277012   🗄️.is 🔗kun

A friend sent me this article about the lying "scientists" at the beginning of 2020 and how they were calling it a natural occurring virus, blah blah blah lies.

I am surprised microsoft is posting this. I guess they have to accept the truth and try to get on the right side. This needs to get out for the normies. It's a good read, even knowing what is known.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/caught-red-handed-scientists-call-for-full-retraction-of-nature-s-proximal-origin-paper-as-fraud-accusations-mount/ar-AA1eB6IW?

 

‘Caught-Red-Handed': Scientists Call for Full Retraction of Nature's Proximal Origin Paper, as Fraud Accusations Mount

 

A growing number of people, including prominent scientists, are calling for a full retraction of a high-profile study published in the journal Nature in March 2020 that explored the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

 

The paper, whose authors included immunology and microbiology professor Kristian G. Andersen, declared that evidence clearly showed that SARS-CoV-2 did not originate from a laboratory.

 

"Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus," the authors wrote in February.

 

Yet a trove of recently published documents reveal that Andersen and his co-authors believed that the lab leak scenario was not just possible, but likely.

 

"[The] main thing still in my mind is that the lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario," Andersen said to his colleagues, according to a report from Public, which published a series of Slack messages between the authors.

 

Anderson was not the only author who privately expressed doubts that the virus had natural origins. Public cataloged dozens of statements from Andersen and his co-authors-Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes, and Robert F. Garry-between the dates January 31 and February 28, 2020 suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 may have been engineered.

Anonymous ID: 3fab66 July 31, 2023, 8:17 p.m. No.19277109   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7174

>>19277048

check out 4 chan I thought. A great bunch of brilliant minds dwell there. This will be exciting listening to them and learning.

JHC

The ride is … amazing(I have no words)