Anonymous ID: 954202 Aug. 1, 2023, 6:54 a.m. No.19278705   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8713

>>19278215

Anons, perhaps this anon is hope-fagging here, but at 1:08 into this vid, a normally well-spoken actor stumbles and REAALLLYYY emphasizes "Q". There's a major stumble during "lgbt… Q.. Q community".

 

Anyone else think this is relevant?

Anonymous ID: 954202 Aug. 1, 2023, 7:31 a.m. No.19278772   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8775

>>19278550

Anon, there's also the entire possibility that, just like those who are currently employed as law enforcement:

 

A society can be easily judged by the actions it takes against known criminals, and most specifically, child traffickers. If the society doesn't condemn it and help root out the members inside it which traffic children, they aren't innocent.

 

It's just like the whole: "There aren't any good cops until such time as there aren't bad cops. The good protect the bad and thus become bad themselves."

 

It's not a condemnation of missions of "innocent" anyone. It's a statement of logic: either you accept child trafficking or you do not, and those who do have no place in polite society.

 

There is no room for negotiation on this. If you know and do nothing about pedophilia or even worse pedovores, then your <select group protecting a known pedovore hereshouldn't be allowed to coexist amongst societies that do not agree.