>>19279783

We need a law which states unequivocally the following:

Should the US government choose to enter into any form of armed conflict outside of the US, or it's territorial waters, all direct and secondary relatives of anyone voting for the conflict should be LEGALLY REQUIRED to serve in front line and shock troops.

No more "daddy made sure I was in the air force" BS.

No. [You] vote to send US soldiers into harm's way, then [your] children should be the front line bullet stops. If [your] kid already has a military position, too bad. Oh Jebby is pushing paper? Not any more, here's a rifle asshat. Oh Billy's a pilot? Not any fukkin more, here's a rifle ya little politically connected piece of shit.

Send [their] kids out to die for their stupid ass ideas. Keep the rest at home.

>>19279888

*should be forced to serve in the front lines or as shock troops.

F'ed that up.

>>19279914

Anon has been saying for more than a decade that the police REALLY need to be held to account for their actions. And it needs to be civilian ONLY. No part of it should intersect with the legal system AT. ALL.

This cop should be publicly tried, and if convicted they should receive the death penalty. Of even more import: conviction should bar said officer from ever holding any form of public office or title ever again.

Make America Great Again, put judges, cops, and lawyers all in the back seat to the citizenry. Start jailing judges who overstep. Start publicly TRYING judges.

>>19280001

Grammar fags weigh in on this one:

Shouldn't the phrase be "pertaining to my 'PEACEFUL & PATRIOTIC' Speech"?

Instead of peaceFULLY and patrioticALLY?

So would Fully Ally indicate something that hasn't been shown yet? Fully controlled?

Anyone?

>>19280044

Apologies for not communicating clearly:

>outside legal system

Anon didn't say this. Anon said they should receive public, and fair, trials. Anon said that this should in no way intersect with the corrupt and rotten judicial system we currently have.

Anon doesn't believe that the current judicial system is proper or worthwhile in that it's been shown ad infinitum to give corrupt lawyers, judges, DA's and cops free passes.

Many Americans are well aware of the sheer level of corruption within local PD's and courtrooms. Ask anyone who's had to deal with the family courts and you'll hear worse. NONE of the people involved in our judicial systems are worth saving. Best to just start fresh.

The law isn't followed and our judicial system has been turned upside down. We are guilty until proven innocent and that also isn't worthwhile.

Until the cops/judges/DA's/politicians start suffering for their complicity, nothing will change.

Including straw man arguments.

Try them by a jury of their peers, without the protection of the other players in the "just-us" system.

Use the ACTUAL law. Let NORMAL people decide the verdict SANS judicial tampering that's so prevalent.

>>19280094

Basically, yes. They need to be removed from power while also being shown the true might of a judicial system based entirely around your fellow countrymen.

Wonder how many of these protected kiddy diddlers wouldn't fare well once the lid was blown off and justice was blind (with fury) once again.

REALLY gotta wonder why people still defend the people who have proven that power needs to be adequately constrained by non-political people.

Why are we protecting child rapists again? Why are they being allowed their preferential treatment simply because they wear a badge? Why aren't they held to a higher standard than the common citizen for being granted the right to beat / maim / rob / kill pretty much anyone they want to with little to no repercussions?

>>19280102

Thank you both for this. Figured there was a simple explanation.