>>1928668 lb

Lawfag, here - never seen Gowdy take a wrong step. The consummate professional. Those angry that he didn’t “deliver” on Benghazi were missing that his ethics bound him to play by the rules, and rules were stacked against them. He has repeatedly bemoaned the lack of having the tools provided criminal prosecutors. He’d be a fine, ethical choice. I do worry that there could be some conflict between upcoming legal cases and his position on the court, if approved. Not enough to be against it.

>>1929015

A good lesson for the global warming activists to learn. Thanks for pointing this out.

>>1929035

I agree that it is pure insanity to try to raise a family with both parents working. Think how much better things would be if there were parents (mom or dad, doesn’t matter) back in the community caring for the kids, being able to run errands without having to take off work, care for sick or elderly relatives instead of paying low skilled workers to do that for you. Just putting families and babies back up on the priority hierarchy would make us a kinder society, less materialistic and less consumption driven.

>>1929167

No. She’s a strong personality, entertaining and a patriot but while a competent lawyer and trial judge, not of the brilliance that should be on the Supreme Court. She demurred to constitutional lawyer guests all the time on her show because she knows that is their area, not hers. Moreover, she’s a celebrity and always will be. Not what I, personally, would like to see on the highest court.

>>1929174

There is a big difference between a lawyer, a judge and a justice. Some can do all, well. Others, even brilliant ones, are more suited for one role more than another.

>>1929192

Iran.

>>1929198

Criminal law is built on Constitutional law principles - much more than is civil law. The Supremes have to deal with administrative law issues but most of what comes before them goes straight back to the Constitution.