>There are other ## posts but how do you search posts
not perfect, but try 'fly#' and 'fly##':
https://qalerts.net/?q=fly%23
https://qalerts.net/?q=fly%23%23
>Anybody else notice this? Years ago Q failed a pw attempt
We made a mistake on /qresearch/ exposing the password.
We did not input "Q #" in the beginning which exposed the password.
Error corrected.
Safe.
Q
>Q told us we'll find out who was talking to us.. so….
>kek
God bless - I must go for good at this point.
Q
Moar than 1 Q?
Boer
>Please advise.
An itemized total sum of deaths in wars and conflicts "killed or allowed to die by human decision" of approximately 231 million for the 100 years of the 20th Century. https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/deaths-wars-and-conflicts-20th-century
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/69395/29-Leitenberg-Deaths-in-Wars-3ed.pdf
https://necrometrics.com/all20c.htm
>>11.3 - Podesta indicted
>>11.6 - Huma indicted
>I don't think this has taken place yet.
When you read each Q Post ask yourself who the information is intended for and what is the information intended to accomplish. Among other things Q informed us that not all posts were meant for anons.
If a Q post reveals information similar to 'Patton has an army in England' or 'The landing will be at Pas-de-Calais' or 'We'll be on the beach on the next new moon', think about both the intended target of the information as well as the information's purpose. With information that reveals strategy, tactics, or deadlines the target of that information is the opposing force and the purpose is military deception.
In the writings of Q this is true of dates and/or hints of dates in particular. For example, 'D5' was a very successful illustration of a feint that caused the opposing force to take an unnecessary action.
"A feint is an offensive action involving contact with the adversary conducted for the purpose of deceiving the adversary as to the location and/or time of the actual main offensive action." (JP 3-13.4 I-9)
The 'D5' feint resulted in the GHWB funeral. The opposing force wasted 'ammunition' (Q#2553). The following objective was achieved:
"Causing the adversary to misallocate personnel, fiscal, and material resources in ways that were advantageous to the friendly force." (JP 3 - 13.4 I-6)
In the writings of Q '11.3' and '11.11.18' are examples of information that conveys multiple possible interpretations. Information like '11.3' and '11.11.18' is consistent with DISO, or Deception in Support of Operations Security. DISO:
"… protects friendly operations, personnel, programs, equipment, and other assets against foreign intelligence and security services (FISS) collection. The intent of a DISO is to create multiple false indicators to confuse or make friendly force intentions harder to interpret by FISS, limiting the ability of FISS to collect accurate intelligence on friendly forces. DISOs are general in nature, they are not specifically targeted against particular adversary military, paramilitary, or VEO decision makers, but are, instead, used to protect friendly operations and forces by obfuscating friendly capabilities, intent, or vulnerabilities. (JP 3-13.4 I-2)
CBTS and /qresearch were used as MILDEC conduits.
"Within MILDEC, conduits are information or intelligence gateways to the deception target. Conduits may be used to control flows of information to a deception target. It is rare that a deceptive message is sent directly to the deception target itself. Most often, deception messages are sent to intelligence collectors (conduits) with the expectation that the deceptive message will systematically make its way to the deception target." (JP 3-13.4 I-4)
Anons who interpreted and amplified 'D5', '11.3','11.11.18', etc. served a specific and positive purpose.
Not every Q post is intended to deceive. The conduit and the information source had to appear authentic and real information was shared along with information similar to the above examples.
Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication JP 3-13.4 explains further if you are interested: https://jfsc.ndu.edu/portals/72/documents/jc2ios/additional_reading/1c3-jp_3-13-4_mildec.pdf
Agreed on all points, Anon.
First 46 posts unsigned.
Alice & Wonderland signature intermittent use beginning at Post 47 - 60.
Multiple 'Goodbye' posts. (picrel).
Distinct writing styles.
What is it that you seek proof of, Anon?
During his 35 years in the American Foreign Service (1956-1991), Jack Matlock served as Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991, Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and Senior Director for European and Soviet Affairs on the National Security Council Staff from 1983 until 1986, and Ambassador to Czechoslovakia from 1981 to 1983.
Before his appointment to Moscow as Ambassador, Mr. Matlock served three tours at the American Embassy in the Soviet Union between 1961 and 1981. His other Foreign Service assignments were in Vienna, Munich, Accra, Zanzibar and Dar es Salaam, in addition to tours in Washington as Director of Soviet Affairs in the State Department (1971-74) and as Deputy Director of the Foreign Service Institute (1979-80). Before entering the Foreign Service Mr. Matlock was Instructor in Russian Language and Literature at Dartmouth College (1953-56).
https://slaviceurasian.duke.edu/jack-matlock-phd
https://jackmatlock.com/
PULLING UP SPECIFIC POSTS
Just type in the post number with a preceding # sign. Example: "#3400"
https://qalerts.net/posts/help/