>>19304979 (pb)

how dare I? because I'm sick of the constant stupidity of engaging these fools who are only here to cause conflict. Do you need to state their propaganda as a leading question? no you do not

how dare I what?

I said it was satire.

read the other linked post which was me saying 'if you didn't figure it out that is satire' here: >>19304970 (pb)

my point: why are you engaging these haters? obviously they are full of shit.

obviously everyone who suffers tyranny doesn't deserve it. Obviously many people died in WWII who didn't do anything wrong and were victimized by governments that were out of control.

you know this.

they know it.

so why argue with them?

they will never relent.

>>19305054

the real truth is that elites on both sides often aligned and intermarried.

the marxists make up fake histories that they use to divide, I agree with that.

each person in history is an individual.

to say that 'all of them were' something-something is a narrative of division.

we seem to be on the same side of this.

>>19305084

You can vote for whoever you want to vote for, anon.

no one here is going to stop you from casting your vote, nor does it matter to us that you vote for whoever you want to vote for.

>>19305123

who has the right to 'allow' that?

sounds like war-criminal like thinking.

>>19305160

no, anon, there are rich and there are poor.

if you for get that and you are poor then you

you

you

are ignoring the situation as it is.