Stephen Miller
In proclaiming that President Trump’s assertions and beliefs about illegal/ineligible ballots were incorrect (the entire basis of DOJ’s prosecution), how many mail-in envelopes/ballots do you think Garland’s DOJ personally inspected to determine, at a minimum, a.) signature match b.) age of voter c.) registration status d.) citizenship status e.) residence f.) criminal history (felony bar) g.) whether, upon interviewing envelope signatories, the ballots were unlawfully harvested or collected by a third party h.) whether, upon interviewing signatories, they are willing to attest on penalty of perjury that they themselves filled out and enclosed ballots within or i.) the ballot/envelope was received, completed and submitted in a fashion fully compliant with duly-enacted state law (not announced policy in violation of state law) at the time of the election?
The stunning unconstitutionality of its prosecution aside, how can DOJ even proceed with case until it has first performed the above investigation of a sufficiently large sample of ballot envelopes in every swing state, particularly in Dem strongholds?
Note: this would not be a DOJ “recount” of shaded ovals but a rigorous factual assessment of the human data on ballot envelopes against all existing records and laws to determine the rate of invalid mailed ballots across all battlegrounds.
1:27 PM · Aug 6, 2023
https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1688240337674743810