Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 3:45 p.m. No.19317705   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19317612

Well if by 'the U.S." crazy Nancy means "the now bankrupt corporation 'U.S.' that Congress enacted in 1871", yes, yes indeed "the U.S." is not only coming to an end, it already is the end, just needs 'public' ingestion which is now habbening.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 3:49 p.m. No.19317726   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7752

>>19317699

The operating system of the globalist cult and the shills who infiltrate QR, is a logic of INTENTIONAL INVOCATION of KNOWING inconsistencies(dialectic), i.e. LIES.

Shills want Anons to perceive the shill's own psychological projections as 'observations' about ontological reality.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:02 p.m. No.19317807   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7816 >>7867

>>19317752

>So are you arguing then that Anons refuting their propaganda as bullshit that isn't welcome and calling them MuhJoos is "smearing the messenger?"

  1. The muhjoo shill's message was already refuted. The same refuted message doesn't need to keep being refuted over and over in lockstep with the shilling. Refutation is one counter example to their universal smearing and slandering.

  2. The messages the muhjoo shills are posting ARE THEMSELVES a planned operation to smear messengers (Q, Anons) as 'fascist, nazi, antisemitic'.

 

>MuhJoo is the name for the shitheads that post their pathetic ethnic accusations, they only have one specific flavor to their posts and they do not deviate from it.

Excellent summary.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:06 p.m. No.19317836   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7843

>>19317800

>Look who's being demonized.

Anons who call out the muhjoo shills are demonized by the muhjoo shills.

The cult who writes the scripts of the muhjoo shills are trying to demonize the truths from QR by REPEATEDLY 'associating' it with fascist, nazi, antisemitic narrative to discredit it.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:08 p.m. No.19317845   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7886

>>19317834

One counter-example is and has always been sufficient to refuting the entire muhjoo logic.

It's been refuted over and over and over again.

The burden of proof is not on Anon to 'refute' or else it's proved, the burden is on the source eliciting the (refuted) universal condemnation logic.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:21 p.m. No.19317913   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7971

>>19317867

>Talmudic Jews

So it's not 'the jews' then? It's a subset?

>I am an anon who posts truth on the Talmudic jews for new eyes, which hasn't been refuted.

Hasn't been refutedโ€ฆto your satisfaction.

Who cares, you're not recognized by Anon as the judge and jury of any and all replies to your own pronouncements.

 

>This is almost an admission of his own operation to censor QResearch.

The muhjoo shill spam IS ITSELF intended to censor/suppress truths that otherwise would disseminate.

It's designed to discredit QR.

It's designed to smear and slander QR so that fake news can trick new eyes into dismissing the great awakening as 'just fascist nazi antisemitic dog whistles'.

It's the same pattern the communists have been using since at least 1943.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:36 p.m. No.19318013   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8080

>>19317886

Anon already refuted the muhjoo shill logic. It just takes one counter-example.

 

Repeatedly muhjooing and repeatedly demanding Anon view you as judge and jury to assess any and all replies as 'refutations' or 'not refutations', isn't working and never has.

Anon doesn't recognize you as any authority to assess the final judgment on any replies to your own posts.

Anon thinks for themselves and doesn't need to persuade any muhjoo shill.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 4:40 p.m. No.19318033   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8080

>>19317971

>We'll just have to agree to disagree then.

>I look forward to Jesus coming

I look forward to the inconsistent system that is the globalist satanic cult to continue collapsing on its own hubris.

 

>all are Truths, that's what has been going on, wake up.

What are 'all truths'?

>Unless you are one of them.

Inconsistent collectivist logic.

Anonymous ID: ebda92 Aug. 7, 2023, 5:17 p.m. No.19318255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19318222

Bingo. they always project.

 

>saying muhjoo is anti semitic since it is saying jews blame jews which is inaccurate

Saying "saying muhjoo is antisemitic since it is saying Jews blame Jews, which is inaccurate", is itself inaccurate because saying muhjoo has no bearing on the background of the muhjoo shill.