NORMIES ARE NOT WAKING UP - "GREAT AWAKENING" IS FAILING, BIGLY
https://civicscience.com/about-us/
time for overt action yet?
aksing for a frenโฆ
NORMIES ARE NOT WAKING UP - "GREAT AWAKENING" IS FAILING, BIGLY
https://civicscience.com/about-us/
time for overt action yet?
aksing for a frenโฆ
how many hundred posts have been deleted from this bread already?
shall anons count the missing post numbers?
been watching breads all day
not one CP or other illegal post
the ADL doesn't censor as much content as bakers/BVs/BO
ANONS, ARE YOU WATCHING?
>What is the direct page source?
been posting these for WEEKS
this company provides polls to thousands of unrelated websites as trivial distractions in the margins
i answered this one on a weather radar site
if i give you a link to that site, a different poll will pop up
now if you believe that only libtards check weather radar, then you can go ahead and spin-doctor the result to calm you cognitive dissonance
or you could go to the supermarket and take a poll yourself, if you need confirmation that NORMIES ARE NOT WAKING UP.
>cia runs largest pedo ring
>cia runs largest propaganda ring
>post muhjoo hate to qr
a-hemโฆ and who runs the cia, pray tell, or is that on the list of forbidden topics?
i notice you always use "muhjoo" instead of jew
you should avoid playing poker
>Over Half of Americans think that Jewish Climate Change is a JEWISH SCAM
funny, bcs the boomers are the ones who believe it's a scam.
the psyop brainwashed youth are the ones that still believe the climate hoax
filtered for being a boring repetitious unimaginative glownigger
>about the same amount as you have posted?
funny, none of YOUR 24 WORTHLESS posts have been deleted? your shekels are in no dangerโฆ
>And it's zero secret that moojoos jew-hate spammers are taint.
what is NO SECRET is that JEWS and their puppets are the only ones who censor free speech.
where's your smart as ad hominem reply to that?
'cause you got no substantive argument against it.
Q posted here when there were tons of posts that talked about jew crimes. Q never said beans about them.
>girls only want boyfriends who have great meme skills
well that OBVIOUSLY leaves you out. good thing for you you're a faggot assfuck who doesn't like girls.
>I'm afraid you're not even questioning its validity, could be completely fake and you're trusting it.
I'm afraid you're not even questioning its validity, could be completely true and you're dissing it.
>You're calling us muhjoo shills for pointing out corrupt Jews who are not Jews?
i'd say to you, the proof is in the pudding. ask yourself, who is censoring free speech and you'll know who's who and which is which.
>It tells the deep states effort to have thousands of homosexuals gain priesthood in 60s and 70s. They werenโt Catholic but identified that way to carry out evil. That was all part of the Vatican 2 crap.
and perhaps you might enlighten us, to what group did this conveniently non-descript "deepstate" belong?
no more than you can prove it's corrupted
in which case, apply common sense
how many people still getting boosters?
why IS that, if they're awake?
your cognitive dissonance is staggering
maybe you should spend some time away from this echo chamber, and TALK with more normies.
> but they are not jews
sauce?
isn't that what you say to everyone who posts shit you don't want to believe?
censoring free speech is the BEST and most effective way to show who you work for.
by all means, CONTINUE.
ps, i'm not attacking jews
i'm attacking the comped fucks who censor this board
if you conflate that with attacking jews
they you say more about yourself than any anons ever could
CENSOR AWAY, FAGGOTS
sryโฆ 2000 yr old translated, transliterated, edited, and redacted dogma is NOT SAUCE.
>Who cares if you attack Jews?
obviously the BO/BVs and their hand-picked baker crews
oughta tell ya somethin' dontcha think?
at least i post SOMETHING from an external source
YOU are the one who posts only your private half-assed hare-brained retarded cognitive dissonance driven opinions
you think that means you win the debate?
your reeeeeeeing is the most effective evidence that i'm right, and you're a buffoon (or a troll).
>If you're going to argue like a child not getting its own way then I will treat you like one.
CENSOR AWAY
DELETE ALL MY POSTS
YOU ONLY PROVE I'M TELLING THE TRUTH
GOD, you're fucking stupid
i see they needed to bring another member of shill team six to JUSTIFY CENSORSHIP.
too bad for you anons see you
>UIDs would not be through the roof, too many offended liberals would be screaming for government to shut everything down
if "they" could shut this place down it would have happened long ago
so instead they infiltrate and insert comped fucks as BO/BVs to do their censorship dirty work.
PROVE ME WRONG
your lame-ass strawman argument only proves you have NO DEFENSE for censoring free speech.
keep going, you're winning the debate for me
>Shills whinning about censorship as if it's the first time they've experienced it
when the cops arrest you for being a pedo, tell them it's not as if it's the first time anyone raped a child
see how your "argument" (and i use the term VERY loosely) works on them
>It was an analogy, not a straw-man argument.
a false analogy is exactly what a straw-man arguement is, you illiterate glownigger
>you did nothing wrong
correct. i exercised free speech.
the people who CENSOR free speech are the criminals
772 replies, and i only loaded this page around 500.
better go back and read the threads first, anons, because if you refresh, all the posts challenging censorship will be deleted (censored).
how many moar breads do they need to censor before anons demand jim replace the BO/BVs?