>>1931851 (pb)
opposite news
shouldn't that be
"McCabe barred by fbi from proving he lied"
Yep. Threw me off, about when "Q" came on last bread or so.
There were originally two pictures given out which didn't match. Some say the one was from twenty years ago. Maybe they got a newer version for the questioning? Hard to tell from only one smirking photo.
>Any discussion regarding his identity after this mornings video is nothing but a slide
This I don't agree with. Anytime I hear a "Discussion closed" I get suspicious. Where's the vid you speak of? Sauce?
Can't get away from the fact that an obvious other guy's pic was originally released, nor that it's physically impossible to do all the tweets attributed to him and his alleged lover, in the time span given.
So there were in any case other people using the tag "Strzok"
As if FBI couldn't be spies or actors.
Sorry I don't take what they tell me without looking farther and thinking. Logic
We have no proof he did *any of the text messages.
Interdasting.
Once you catch the FBI in a lie, you can't believe any shit they say.
That was the original photo they gave for Strzok.
That guy walked out with them in the iconic photo the day the story broke. "Strzk's" was never seen til today.
See him to the left in the second image here?
>(You