>>19319951 pb
>cry more
why? you need someone to give you a woody, pedo?
technobabble jargonspeak gibberish from an illiterate diversity hire bimbette who couldn't define a single word she read from the script.
>my-th
>my: first person possessive
>th: part of a whole
>a part of me; one of my parts
>my-th-ology
>my: first person possessive
>th: part of a whole
>ology: study of
>the study of my parts (psychology)
>each deity of the greek parthenon exhibits one or more mental maladies.
>hermes, is able to navigate and interact with them suffering no ill effects.
>a road map of mental deviations of sorts. and navigation instructions.
>mystery
>my-stery
>my story
if the asinine word games you play actually had any meaning to them, wouldn't they have to give the same result when translated into every language?
PS - they don't
go back to YT where morans might swallow your retarded drivel
>They use military comms to do their dirt
huh…
and here i thought they used chatrooms of video games. guess that whole digg was bs then?
>or let's* the underlings run day to day operations
*that's a contraction for let us
lets is the third-person singular simple present indicative of the verb let…
NO APOSTROPHE
the grammar cat has been summoned
>caused by red meat
vegan PETA flake masquerading as anon detected
Vegan influencer Zhanna Samsonova has allegedly “died of starvation” after subsisting exclusively on a diet of exotic fruit in Malaysia, according to her friends and family.
She was 39.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/31/vegan-influencer-starved-to-death-friends/
>Operation Popeye about to commence.
>It was all clean bc they didnt check military.
must missed the sauce on that….
care to supply some?
>Gag orders are used as tools for unfair advantage, hampering the ability for interested parties to consider arguments about a case with integrity.
tell the BO/BVs/bakers who censor free speech
that's less than half of your claim, and utterly insignificant in and of itself, asshat
where's the evidence mil comms were used?
>Rectum?
>Shills whine, Anons shine
yeah… and looking at your 22 posts (out of 170 total) it's obvious that you glow bright enough to be seen from the ISS
non-sequitur. anon speech is NOT censored by spammers. if it were, then why is every other form of spam tolerated? you only censor anything related to jews. your argument fails, again.
YOU GLOW
>it is 'una' after all
given the size of her, a-hem, "IQ," maybe she meant it to say una pala bra, "a spade-full bra"
>Yes, it is because the breads are finite not infinite.
no it isn't, because there's always another bread. the ONLY effect would be fewer notables per bread.
YOUR half-assed argument fails AGAIN
try harder GLOWIE
>That is precisely the censorship intent of the spammers.
how exactly does that equal censorship?
logic much?
thx for outing yourself, GLOWIE
>Biden-Harris Administration Releases First-Ever U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism
apparently includes censoring free speech on 8kun
>False. muhjoo spam is categorically distinct from posting sauced dogs that implicate guilty individuals.
then WHY did you delete this meme? it highlights a GUILTY INDIVIDUAL?
guess that's where the "vatican gold" all went.
just "coincidentally" the same amount as 650 plane loads.
>1. there would be more notable digs.
patently IDIOTIC statement. fewer notables PER BREAD does NOT equal fewer notables in toto
>2. there would be more 'new eyes' who aren't deceived into dismissing the source as 'nazi', thereby increasing the dissemination of 'notable' information.
pure baseless speculation presented without any supporting evidence
TARGETED CENSORSHIP GLOWS
>Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
(176610 lbs/plane) x (14.583 TROY oz/lb) x ($2000/TROY oz) x (650 planes) ≈ $3.34 TRILLION
learn how to do 5th grade conversions, faggot clown
>Who EXACTLY is guilty in THIS picture?
the very fact that you have to ask speaks volumes
your reply answered the question far more eloquently than i could
the "millions" of people who FAIL to denounce this, who financially and philosophically SUPPORT it, are anything BUT innocent
just like you
> too busy laughing at your attempts to be convincing
did that juvenile retort work with your woke grade school teachers?
>My parents never bought me a barbie doll.
are you a biological female?
then you were one of the lucky ones.
>TARGETING 8kun/QR to pre-CENSOR information output does indeed GLOW.
"pre-censor"
KEK
did you pick that up on CNN?
or was it rachel madcow?
twist an squirm all you want, your convoluted illogic only highlights your desperation to censor free speech
there is NOT justification you can manufacture that doesn't GLOW
>you are failing to denounce the individuals of your 'tribe' who commit guilty acts
so, now you're onmicient?
how could you possibly know whom i do or do not denounce?
>Another muhjoo shill copypasta pattern.
another glownigger shill copypasta pattern.
you're the one who just condemned free-speakers for "pre-censoring" anons.
hypocrite much?
anyone who provides financial support to the cowardly murderous practices of the state of israel IS BY ANY CIVILIZED LEGAL STANDARD COMPLICIT, AND AN ACCESSORY BEFORE THE FACT.
FUCK YOUR "SMEARING THE INNOCENT" BY ASSOCIATION BULLSHIT
you really that fucked up in the head?
infiltrating jan 6 did NOT pre-censor the truth
the msm flat out CENSORS all truth, and manufactures whatever lies it needs
hardly the equivalent of a few "it's the jews" posts on 8kun
>PRE CENSORSHIP IS A REAL TIME STRATEGY OF THE GLOBALIST CULT
you've just exposed yourself as part of the globalist cult bcs YOU are the ones pre-censoring "it's the jews" on a supposed free speech board
logic much?
>Sounds like Palestinian butthurt
obsessed with anal references?
faggot much?
jews brag about having the gayest country on earth, in the "Times of Israel" no less.
gonna censor that?
>you stupid son of a bitch
finally forced to admit you can't defend an indefensible postion in a logical debate?
QED
>You had your chance, and you still do,
i trash POTATO and every other DS piece of shit relentlessly, and i post plenty of notables, too
>yet you muhjoo instead
but i'm NOT posting "it's the jews"
i'm attacking your censorship
or are you acknowledging that you are a jew, here to censor?
lame deflection
>Screengrabbed for posterity.
that's a laugh
most guilty people destroy the evidence of their crimes
you must have the intellect of the street thugs who post vids of their crimes on soc media
>By giving fake news and the criminals at the DOJ, FBI and the House a story of 'insurrection'
AS IF…. msm needs plants to tell lies. they make up whatever shit they want, and normies swallow it.
or did you miss the pictures of reporters standing in front of burning cities saying "mostly peaceful protests?"
>Thanks for just admitting that the LOGIC of the muhjoo spam is to precensor!
i didn't "admit" any such thing
i pointed out YOUR self-contradictory bullshit
>yet you muhjoo instead
but i'm NOT posting "it's the jews"
i'm attacking your censorship
or are you acknowledging that you are a jew, here to censor?
what?
no reply?
pure deflection. sidestepping that would make any matador jealous
>yet you muhjoo instead
but i'm NOT posting "it's the jews"
i'm attacking your censorship
or are you trying to tell us that you are a jew, here to censor?
no reply?
still WAITING
>By trying to 'flip' the script, you sanctioned the logic.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
by flipping the script, i exposed YOUR hypocrisy
i didn't "sanction" shit, retard
still not slow enough for ya?
lemme get a crayon and draw you a picture
YOU'RE A FUCKING GLOW NIGGER HERE TO CENSOR FREE SPEECH
>You can't accept the fact that there are moar arguing for its removal than there are for it to stay
SAUCE????
>I'll post the quote from just one to imply that means them all.
the quote is what it is
what YOU think it "implies" says more about you than the quote says about jews
if anon posts meme about what POTATO says, does that "imply" all caucasian agree?
you just dig yourself deeper into a hole with every ill-conceived poorly thought out reply
>Nah, you want it too much
>seethe more
tell that to your boyfriend, faggot
your deflections are weaker than your…..
>Re-read that sentence. Then re-read it again.
KEK…
it still says the same thing. maybe YOU need to re-re-read it again.
>racial division narrative incessantly 24/7 non-stop for years about whites
but it's NOT racial. judiasm and zionism are a CHOICE, just like your faggotry.
>Wolf has been cried one to many times and the hunters are returning from being on a wild goose chase for way too long now, but it was no fault of their own.
i will not waste any time trying to decipher that string of gibberish. your AI is malfunctioning.
>yet you muhjoo instead
but i'm NOT posting "it's the jews"
i'm attacking your censorship
or are you "implying" that you are a jew, here to censor?
no reply?
still WAITING
don't cry
FAR better men than you failed to win a debate with me
>I have nothing else better to do than make myself look stupid to make you look stupider
how's that working out for ya?
you expect anons to believe you're not on a payroll?
>Start an argument anyway possible to waste bread
takes more than one to argue
by your "logic" you're as guilty as me of "pre-censoring" the bread, and your post count proves it
weasel out of that one, brainiac
>Last nickel I'll give you, kid; you won't leech another reply off me to pad your paycheck
takes more than one to argue
by your "logic" you're as guilty as me of "pre-censoring" the bread, and your post count proves it
weasel out of that one, brainiac
>Your tactic is to use us, instead I'm using you
so… your tactic is to waste bread, bcs when YOU do it, it's magically not "pre-censorship"
you (and your team of sycophantic shills) have gobbled FAR more bread than all the "it's the jews" posts in a typical week
ahhhh… smoking pepe
'cuz everyone knows he's anon, just like us
tell me again… who exactly is "holding onto that "pre-censorship" like a flotation device"
me?
or the censors using it as an excuse to censor free speech?
>You mad?
>Yeah, you mad
LMAO
i'm comfy AF
yer the one who cannot explain why it's ok for you to gobble bread without being guilty of "pre-censorship"
so you can only resort to lame come-backs
>You want to gobble bread with argument, so I gave you what you wanted
WAIT…. you're the one who said gobbling bread is bad bcs it's "pre-censorship"
so YOU gobble bread and encourage me to do the same, to prove how bad it is?
but magically it's not "pre-censorship" if you do it?
did i get that right?
>bread gobbling maggots
but HE'S the one in charge who justifies censorship as a way to prevent bread gobbling
i'm just point out his hypocrisy
feigned superiority is the lamest tactic to which you've stooped
still doesn't justify CENSORSHIP
nothing you post does
>I'm the one taking notes and getting ready to bake since I don't see any volunteers
so… in charge of censorship
didn' t hear any denials