BREAKING: 90-Year-Old Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein Hospitalized After Tripping and Falling in San Francisco

by Jim Hᴏft Aug. 9, 2023 9:30 am

Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein, a current member of the Senate, was hospitalized on Tuesday following a fall at her residence in San Francisco, sources revealed to TMZ.

Details surrounding the severity of her injuries remain unclear; however, it has been confirmed that she was admitted to a local hospital for treatment. According to TMZ, she was able to return to her home later that night.

Feinstein’s office has not yet released an official statement regarding her recent fall. At 90 years old, the California Senator has faced several health challenges over the past year, adding to concerns surrounding this recent incident.

This isn’t the first time health concerns have circled around Feinstein. Earlier this year, Feinstein took a nearly three-month hiatus from the Senate to address and recover from a series of medical conditions, including shingles (supposedly), facial paralysis, memory loss, vision and balance impairments and swelling of the brain.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Senator Dianne Feinstein ceded power of attorney to her daughter, Kathleen Feinstein, 66. Feinstein’s daughter was handed power of attorney to deal with legal battles over Richard Blum’s estate.

Dianne Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum recently passed away so Kathleen Feinstein is helping her mother deal with a dispute over a piece of property and Blum’s life insurance. Last week Feinstein appeared confused as she tried to give a speech in the middle of a Senate vote.

Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Patty Murray repeatedly asked Feinstein to “just say aye.” Instead of voting ‘aye,’ Feinstein began to give a speech.

“I would like to support a yes vote on this, it provides $823 billion. That’s an increase of $26 billion for the Department of Defense, and it funds priorities–” Feinstein said as an aide rushed over to her to stop her from giving a long-winded speech. “Just say aye,” the chairwoman said.

A confused Feinstein said, “Ok–just–aye!”

Feinstein handed power of attorney over to her own daughter yet she still serves in the Senate and makes decisions that impact hundreds of millions of Americans!

This is absolutely ridiculous. (It’s not just ridiculous it’s sadistic what they are doing to her. This is Elderly Abuse 10x the scale to put someone in jail.)

This is developing. Please check back for updates.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/breaking-90-year-old-senator-dianne-feinstein-hospitalized/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/breaking-90-year-old-senator-dianne-feinstein-hospitalized/

LEAKED Secret "Cypher" Catches Biden Red Handed In Ouster Of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan - Revolver News

August 9, 2023 (2h ago)1/2

Last month Revolver News broadcast live Dr. Darren Beattie’s interview with ousted and embattled former Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. Beattie pointed out the striking parallels between Trump and Khan–both international superstar celebrities in the 80s, both defeated two corrupt political dynasties to score an historic populist victory in the 2010s, both hated by their respective deep states, both ousted from power from their respective deep states, and both are face multiple indictments from a corrupt justice department controlled by political enemies.

Beattie highlights some of these parallels in his introduction to the interview, which has now amassed over 2 million views across platforms. Watch the full interview HERE.

Though we shouldn’t exaggerate them, the parallels between Imran Khan and Trump really are quite striking

Khan is sitting in jail now thanks to Biden, who would love the same fate to befall Trump pic.twitter.com/yI7PnNorEQ— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) August 9, 2023

Beattie was one of the last two journalists to interview Khan before the corrupt establishment of Pakistan arrested him and tossed him in jail on a phony corruption charge. According to our sources, Khan now languishes in a small 6×9 cell, not allowed a phone, books, newspaper, or human contact, with only insects and flies to keep him company. If the Pakistani deep state can send Pakistan’s beloved populist leader Khan to prison, surely Biden is salivating at the prospect of a similar fate to Trump.

As it turns out, the Biden regime has a direct hand in Khan’s ouster. The question of the Biden regime’s driving role in Khan’s ouster is a delicate one discussed in the most sensitive part of Beattie’s interview with Khan

I was one of the last two international journalists to interview Prime Minister Imran Khan before his arrest: In this critical section of the interview, we discuss the Biden regime's role in his ouster — specifically, the wicked color revolution professional Victoria Nuland pic.twitter.com/7Uz78tVWxR— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) August 5, 2023

In an incredible scoop, The Intercept’s Murtaza Hussain has obtained and publicized a copy of a diplomatic cypher from Pakistan’s former ambassador confirming Biden state department’s role in pushing for the ouster of Khan.

In the document, as recorded by the Pakistani side, State Department officials discussing Khan's neutrality in the Ukraine conflict threatened Pakistan with "isolation" should Khan remain in power and promised "all will be forgiven" if he were removed: https://t.co/1g2nP8MffB pic.twitter.com/ADrSRD6Ng1— Murtaza Hussain (@MazMHussain) August 9, 2023

There is currently a blackout banning reporting of this explosive leak in Pakistani media

🚨🚨#EXCLUSIVE: Authorities banned coverage/reporting/mentioning of @theintercept story in Pakistani media. Message says “Assalamoalaikum.. This one is not to be aired or discussed in talk shows or any program.

Thanks” pic.twitter.com/3EZYtini11 — Asad Ali Toor (@AsadAToor) August 9, 2023

https://www.revolver.news/2023/08/leaked-secret-cypher-catches-biden-red-handed-in-ouster-of-pakistan-prime-minister-imran-khan/

>>19329944

2/2

A few things should be said about this development. First, this is a confirmation that the Biden Administration directly and egregiously interfered in the democratic process of another country, issuing an ultimatum effectively demanding that Pakistan oust its beloved and democratically elected leader. This is a remarkable degree of hypocrisy coming from Biden, who repeatedly condemned Russia for “meddling” in the US elections, even going so far as to call Putin a killer and theatening that Russia will pay a price for its alleged meddling. Recall that the entire regime media seized on the narrative of Russian meddling in order to falsely undermine the legitimacy of Trump’s historic 2016 victory.

The text of the leaked cypher seems to suggest that the primary reason the Biden regime demanded Khan’s ouster was Khan’s visit to Russia shortly after Putin’s invasion of Crimea. It is hard to believe that this is the full truth, and that Khan’s visit to Russia was anything more than an aggravating factor, if not just a pretext. Indeed, the cypher acknowledges what Dr. Beattie asserted in his interview with Khan, that the US State Department official Donald Lu could only have issued such an ultimatum with the approval of the Biden White House and other senior officials.

The mostlikely culprit as the driving force behind Khan’s ouster is none other than Victoria Nuland. Nulandis currently a senior member of Biden’s State Department as Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, and has been a seemingly permanent fixture in Washington’s foreign policy establishment.

A color revolution and regime change specialist, she is perhaps most notorious for her active role in engineering the Euromaidan color revolution in Ukraine.

I've long been on Nuland's case, as she is a key player in the American color revolution regime change cabal https://t.co/xbz91jbuBm — Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) August 5, 2023

In the wake of the recent coup against Biden regime backed government in Niger, Victoria Nuland is most recently reported to be stirring up trouble there—though for now the coup leaders have wisely refused to meet with her.

As it turns out, Nuland has something of a history with Imran Khan. Khan was a major critic of Obama’s drone strike policy in Pakistan, and Nuland happened to be a senior State Department Official under Obama tasked with defending this very policy!

Not only that, Nuland’s husband, Robert Kagan, is one of the intellectual architects of the Iraq War, of which Khan was an extremely prominent and vociferous critic.

Given her special motive, and her means and opportunity, she is far and away the most likely culprit behind the Biden Regime’s ouster of Khan. Ultimately the issue wasn’t about one visit to Russia on the part of Khan, but that Khan, like Trump (also a vocal critic of the disastrous war in Iraq) was not going to be a pliable lap dog for the deep state. For this reason alone, the Biden regime with the assistance of their lackeys in the Pakistani military had to take him out at all costs.

Editor’s note: To see the full text of the leaked cypher from the Pakistani ambassador, see the bottom of the Intercept piece

>https://www.revolver.news/2023/08/leaked-secret-cypher-catches-biden-red-handed-in-ouster-of-pakistan-prime-minister-imran-khan/

>>19329961

March 7, 2022 Pakistani Diplomatic Cypher (Transcription) 1/2

The Intercept is publishing the body of the cable below, correcting minor typos in the text because such details can be used to watermark documents and track their dissemination. The Intercept has removed classification markings and numerical elements that could be used for tracking purposes. Labeled “Secret,” the cable includes an account of the meeting between State Department officials, including Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu, and Asad Majeed Khan, who at the time was Pakistan’s ambassador to the U.S.

“I had a luncheon meeting today with Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Donald Lu. He was accompanied by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Les Viguerie. DCM, DA and Counsellor Qasim joined me”.

At the outset, Don referred to Pakistan’s position on the Ukraine crisis and said that “people here and in Europe are quite concerned about why Pakistan is taking such an aggressively neutral position (on Ukraine), if such a position is even possible. It does not seem such a neutral stand to us.” He shared that in his discussions with the NSC, “it seems quite clear that this is the Prime Minister’s policy.” He continued that he was of the view that this was “tied to the current political dramas in Islamabad that he (Prime Minister) needs and is trying to show a public face.” I replied that this was not a correct reading of the situation as Pakistan’s position on Ukraine was a result of intense interagency consultations. Pakistan had never resorted to conducting diplomacy in public sphere. The Prime Minister’s remarks during a political rally were in reaction to the public letter by European Ambassadors in Islamabad which was against diplomatic etiquette and protocol. Any political leader, whether in Pakistan or the U.S., would be constrained to give a public reply in such a situation.

I asked Don if the reason for a strong U.S. reaction was Pakistan’s abstention in the voting in the UNGA. He categorically replied in the negative and said that it was due to the Prime Minister’s visit to Moscow. He said that “I think if the no-confidence vote against the Prime Minister succeeds, all will be forgiven in Washington because the Russia visit is being looked at as a decision by the Prime Minister. Otherwise, I think it will be tough going ahead.” He paused and then said “I cannot tell how this will be seen by Europe but I suspect their reaction will be similar.” He then said that “honestly I think isolation of the Prime Minister will become very strong from Europe and the United States.” Don further commented that it seemed that the Prime Minister’s visit to Moscow was planned during the Beijing Olympics and there was an attempt by the Prime Minister to meet Putin which was not successful and then this idea was hatched that he would go to Moscow.

I told Don that this was a completely misinformed and wrong perception. The visit to Moscow had been in the works for at least few years and was the result of a deliberative institutional process. I stressed that when the Prime Minister was flying to Moscow, Russian invasion of Ukraine had not started and there was still hope for a peaceful resolution. I also pointed out that leaders of European countries were also traveling to Moscow around the same time. Don interjected that “those visits were specifically for seeking resolution of the Ukraine standoff while the Prime Minister’s visit was for bilateral economic reasons.” I drew his attention to the fact that the Prime Minister clearly regretted the situation while being in Moscow and had hoped for diplomacy to work. The Prime Minister’s visit, I stressed, was purely in the bilateral context and should not be seen either as a condonation or endorsement of Russia’s action against Ukraine. I said that our position is dictated by our desire to keep the channels of communication with all sides open. Our subsequent statements at the UN and by our Spokesperson spelled that out clearly, while reaffirming our commitment to the principle of UN Charter, non-use or threat of use of force, sovereignty and territorial integrity of States, and pacific settlement of disputes…

https://theintercept.com/2023/08/09/imran-khan-pakistan-cypher-ukraine-russia/

>>19330003

March 7, 2022 Pakistani Diplomatic Cypher (Transcription) 2/2

I also told Don that Pakistan was worried of how the Ukraine crisis would play out in the context of Afghanistan. We had paid a very high price due to the long-term impact of this conflict. Our priority was to have peace and stability in Afghanistan, for which it was imperative to have cooperation and coordination with all major powers, including Russia. From this perspective as well, keeping the channels of communication open was essential. This factor was also dictating our position on the Ukraine crisis. On my reference to the upcoming Extended Troika meeting in Beijing, Don replied that there were still ongoing discussions in Washington on whether the U.S. should attend the Extended Troika meeting or the upcoming Antalya meeting on Afghanistan with Russian representatives in attendance, as the U.S. focus right now was to discuss only Ukraine with Russia. I replied that this was exactly what we were afraid of. We did not want the Ukraine crisis to divert focus away from Afghanistan. Don did not comment.

I told Don that just like him, I would also convey our perspective in a forthright manner. I said that over the past one year, we had been consistently sensing reluctance on the part of the U.S. leadership to engage with our leadership. This reluctance had created a perception in Pakistan that we were being ignored and even taken for granted. There was also a feeling that while the U.S. expected Pakistan’s support on all issues that were important to the U.S., it did not reciprocate and we do not see much U.S. support on issues of concern for Pakistan, particularly on Kashmir. I said that it was extremely important to have functioning channels of communication at the highest level to remove such perception. I also said that we were surprised that if our position on the Ukraine crisis was so important for the U.S., why the U.S. had not engaged with us at the top leadership level prior to the Moscow visit and even when the UN was scheduled to vote. (The State Department had raised it at the DCM level.) Pakistan valued continued high-level engagement and for this reason the Foreign Minister sought to speak with Secretary Blinken to personally explain Pakistan’s position and perspective on the Ukraine crisis. The call has not materialized yet. Don replied that the thinking in Washington was that given the current political turmoil in Pakistan, this was not the right time for such engagement and it could wait till the political situation in Pakistan settled down.

I reiterated our position that countries should not be made to choose sides in a complex situation like the Ukraine crisis and stressed the need for having active bilateral communications at the political leadership level. Don replied that “you have conveyed your position clearly and I will take it back to my leadership.”

I also told Don that we had seen his defence of the Indian position on the Ukraine crisis during the recently held Senate Sub-Committee hearing on U.S.-India relations. It seemed that the U.S. was applying different criteria for India and Pakistan. Don responded that the U.S. lawmakers’ strong feelings about India’s abstentions in the UNSC and UNGA came out clearly during the hearing. I said that from the hearing, it appeared that the U.S. expected more from India than Pakistan, yet it appeared to be more concerned about Pakistan’s position. Don was evasive and responded that Washington looked at the U.S.-India relationship very much through the lens of what was happening in China. He added that while India had a close relationship with Moscow, “I think we will actually see a change in India’s policy once all Indian students are out of Ukraine.”

I expressed the hope that the issue of the Prime Minister’s visit to Russia will not impact our bilateral ties. Don replied that “I would argue that it has already created a dent in the relationship from our perspective. Let us wait for a few days to see whether the political situation changes, which would mean that we would not have a big disagreement about this issue and the dent would go away very quickly. Otherwise, we will have to confront this issue head on and decide how to manage it.”

“We also discussed Afghanistan and other issues pertaining to bilateral ties. A separate communication follows on that part of our conversation”.

Assessment

“Don could not have conveyed such a strong demarche without the express approval of the White House, to which he referred repeatedly. Clearly, Don spoke out of turn on Pakistan’s internal political process. We need to seriously reflect on this and consider making an appropriate demarche to the U.S. Cd’ A a.i in Islamabad.”