Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 8:10 a.m. No.19334089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4610 >>4746 >>4797 >>4861

>>19334056

TYB

Prays for your bro. If you find yourself in the waiting room, maybe watch this:

 

The Roseanne Barr Podcast | #009 Alex Stein

Roseanne and famous provocateur Alex Stein talk candidly about so many controversial subjects that they are likely to be cancelled… again.

 

Aug 10, 2023 1:35:38

https://youtu.be/zcP-VoJd3yA

Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 8:21 a.m. No.19334122   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4589 >>4610 >>4746 >>4797 >>4861

Jonathan Turley ·3h

Biden snapped at Peter Doocy yesterday for asking about his roughly 20 speakerphone calls to dinners or meetings with his son's foreign associates. However, in my view, what was most interesting is what came next…

 

…Doocy said that the White House called him as soon as he made it to his car to refute the specifics of the allegations on discussing business. The use of White House staff to repeat these positions could magnify the problems for Biden.

 

How Donald Trump’s Indictment Could Backfire on Joe Biden

Below is my column in The Messenger on how the second indictment could prove damaging for President Joe Biden. Ironically, both Trump indictments have blowback potential for Biden on the retention of classified material and the dissemination of false claims. Notably, the New York Times has reported that Biden has had his own Thomas Becket moments in telling aides that he wanted Trump indicted and criticizing the Attorney General Merrick Garland for the delay. It is not clear if Smith will “rid [Biden] of this meddlesome president,” but his theory of criminality could prove costly to Biden himself. Indeed, it could be used as a basis for an impeachment inquiry.

 

Here is the column:

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/08/09/how-donald-trumps-indictment-could-backfire-on-joe-biden/

 

7:08 AM · Aug 10, 2023

https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley/status/1689594644391141376

Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 8:37 a.m. No.19334188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4199 >>4598 >>4610 >>4746 >>4797 >>4810 >>4861

AUGUST 09, 2023 The Federalist BY: MARK HEMINGWAY

Obama’s Fraudulent Legacy Is Being Exposed, And It’s On The Wrong Side Of History

 

Barack Obama’s crumbling public image is more Louis Farrakhan, less MLK.

 

Barack Obama is often hailed as one of the greatest orators in modern politics. While he had undeniable gifts in that department, as someone who attended a number of his speeches in person, I never quite understood all the praise. Setting aside his career-making “red states, blue states” speech at the 2004 Democratic convention — a plea for political moderation he spent his time in office repudiating — the only memorable things Obama said were either campaign pablum such as “hope and change,” or remarks that were unintentionally revealing.

 

In the latter category, my personal favorite remark was this comment about congressional Republicans from 2013: “We’re going to try to do everything we can to create a permission structure for them to be able to do what’s going to be best for the country,” he said.

 

“Permission structure” is a phrase that’s been used by marketing executives for many years, and was apparently in common usage at the Obama White House. The idea is “based on an understanding that radically changing a deeply held belief and/or entrenched behavior will often challenge a person’s self-identity and perhaps even leave them feeling humiliated about being wrong. … Permission Structures serve as scaffolding for someone to embrace change that they might otherwise reject.”

 

While there’s more overlap between politics and marketing than anyone would like to admit, the naked use of jargon that comes from the world of consumer manipulation betrays a remarkably egotistical approach to politics. There was no need to address honorable disagreement to Obama’s policies, which were politically extreme and consistently opposed by voters. The White House just needed to create, with the help of a slavish media, narratives that could help people admit they were wrong and come around to his way of thinking.

 

Ironically enough, I thought of the “permission structure” remark reading David Samuels’ interview in Tablet with Obama biographer David Garrow, which is shaping up to be perhaps the most discussed piece of journalism of the year. That’s because the entire article is a really effective “permission structure” for a lot of Obama voters and moderates to finally admit he’s an entirely overrated, largely failed president who was far more radical than he ever let on. He’s also obsessed with celebrity and not very loyal to the people who helped him along the way.

 

In other words, he’s pretty much the guy his critics on the right said he was all along. …

 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/09/obamas-fraudulent-legacy-is-being-exposed-and-its-on-the-wrong-side-of-history/

Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 10:01 a.m. No.19334598   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19334188

>he’s pretty much the guy his critics on the right said he was all along

Sarah Palin was RIGHT!

C-SPAN: Vice Presidential Candidate Gov. Sarah Palin (AK) Full Speech at the RNC

 

936,005 views Sep 4, 2008 45:44

https://youtu.be/UCDxXJSucF4

Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 10:16 a.m. No.19334692   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Chris Stigall

Fox News is telling everyone in media not directly affiliated with them that the August 23rd Republican debate is exclusively theirs and no one is allowed to air any clips of the broadcast beyond three total minutes, and never again after a 7 day window. In other words, they’re treating this debate as if it’s an NFL or MLB broadcast. It’s not. This has never been done and deserves a legal challenge.

 

12:11 PM · Aug 10, 2023

https://twitter.com/ChrisStigall/status/1689670913040568320/photo/1

Anonymous ID: a65853 Aug. 10, 2023, 10:25 a.m. No.19334733   🗄️.is 🔗kun

NewsBusters

YouTube is suppressing monetization for a video that talks about censorship. Clearly there's something these Orwellian companies don't want you to know. They're not fighting misinformation, they're covering up the truth.

 

Ben Shapiro

Ironically, YouTube has suppressed monetization for Episode 1 of my new YouTube series, Facts, because it “discusses New World Order, which is a non-monetizable ‘conspiracy theory’ under [YouTube’s] Dangerous Acts in ad-friendly guidelines.”

 

Except nothing in the video is a conspiracy theory at all.

 

Watch for yourself and get the facts about who is controlling ad revenue on YouTube and all of the largest Big Tech platforms–including this one.

 

12:00 PM · Aug 10, 2023 9:26

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1689668037719261185

12:29 PM · Aug 10, 2023

https://twitter.com/newsbusters/status/1689675328413687808