Tyb
Been on the chans and the kun since 2017, and would like you to describe what it is you are referring to.
Could you use non cringe non cliche stale language and answer the question?
Anon wants to make sure to know what memes are to be labelled as 'famefag'.
>If you don't know the answer you ain't been here that long.
As stated before, been on the 4/8chan and 8kun since 2017.
See many patterns, some come and go, others persist.
It's not that there is no answer, or that Anon is intentionally not acknowledging what the answer is.
One Anon's 'famefag' may not appear so to another Anon.
Hence my question. When YOU reference 'famefag', what exactly are you referring to?
It's a legit question.
>Sounds like a shills baited attempt to enter into monotonous diatribe debate involving colloquially known famefag board personas that any real oldfags already know all about.
Not at all, I won't 'dispute' anything you write in response.
Just list them all out for new eyes here, to help them.
Surely you don't want new eyes to be misled by 'famefag' posts.
Just list them and Anon PROMISES not to start A SINGLE debate or diatribe. Just curious as to what new eyes are to understand as 'famefag'.
So you're ok with new eyes to be misled by 'famefag' posts?
You're promoting what you claim to be against.
Leo smoking pepe meme posts talking about undefined 'famefag' posting, is not included in 'famefag' posting?
Kek
>>19334273
Wonder why you're trying to smear and slander Hoft as something he's not.
Smearing and slandering Hoft to discredit him with lies, nobody except you and your ilk are concerned about that at all.
And no, it doesn't 'reveal' anything other than you whining about such spam getting deleted.
In the shill's minds:
"Q" living rent free.
"Q+" living rent free.
"Jews" living rent free.
"Anons" living rent free.
"Conservative media" exposing cult, living rent free.
"Qresearch" rent free.
You're doing what you claim Hoft is guilty of.
Hoft didn't 'do' what you're projecting onto him with your own warped psychology.
How can you in the same bread criticize Hoft as allegedly 'WP' gesturing, and then you mock jews?
You're your own opponent.
Self-alienation isn't anyone's problem but yours.
>How come the "white supreme" (tm) symbolism only applies when [THEY] want it to?
But you just did it yourself to smear Hoft, so clearly you're claiming it 'applies' when you want it to.
This Anon is not saying it's 'WP' when either Hoft or Obama or Bush or Clinton do it. It'sto show that 'they' are trying to control people's bodies by slandering and smearing anyone who gestures what is used an OK hand gesture, not a hate gesture.
You are doing exactly what you claim is wrong.
>since it was you, not me, that brought up the Jews.
Another lie.
You brought up the narrative here: