So much for the 'investigatory' unselect committee of criminals.
Please reference posts for saving/storage to help new eyes.
Quite anti-semitic actually. As if crime must be defended with innocent human shields to serve as correct logic among allegedly polylogist divided humanity.
They do what they wilt, it seems.
So what's your point in posting vague references to a set at all if your reply is that you believe everyone who should know already knows, and everyone who doesn't know won't be told?
What's the point of continuing to only point what is already allegedly known?
"That's the thing", actually the 'thing' is a request for you to reference what exactly it is that Anons are to conclude.
It's retarded to reply with 'because you can't read my mind I won't tell you' bullshit.
"Trope"
"Classic anti-semitism"
Anon notices these are too often used as smears by 'anti-fascist' orgs to fascistically lie and character assassinate innocent people, including jews caught in crossfire who reject the hegelian marxist 'we are gods' psychosis but are all character assassinated by association when Trump says 'globalists'.
The more these voices scream anti-semitism at mentions of war mongering globalists, the more they project their own desire to want conflict against innocent all jews who get smeared as 'included'.
The globalist cult is holding 'jews' and the world hostage. Clear as day.
And why do you red text your own words besides Q drops, instead of red texting the Q drop words and keeping your words regular text?
You're whining that anons refuse to play a game of pretending to read minds.
Please post references to what memes/poats you're referring to, nobody can read your mind, no, it's not true that if Anon can't read your mind that they cannot be told.
What are you afraid of?
Are you chicken?
Bawk bawk bawk.
$trillions spent on attacks and smears.
#2 threat.
Just do the math. How much is each Anon UID worth?
BILLIONS.
And the shilling still won't work.
Kek
>what we've got to do is protect the jews anon
Anon will protect the innocent, regardless of 'background'
>those poor jews, they're the real victims in this
Number #1 or #2 target of shills on QR.
Shills helping hate groups like ADL use words like 'tropes' and 'classic' to discredit Anons, reference muhjoo spam as 'proof' lf anything.
It's all a psyop.
Everyone is human, nobody above another.
No 'group' of people are to be blindly attacked or blindly trusted. Each individual is responsible for their own actions.
copium
Anon never said what you're saying.
Anon's background is irrelevant to statements being true or false.
Sauce
Professional slanderers.
HIDF
Anon neither blanket condemns nor blanket defends any group of people based on class, or race, or sex, or political affiliation.
That's all sourced by the play both sides deceivers.
Anon has no NEED for weaponized symbolism.
anon improved the logo to make sure it doesn't just speak to any set of humans, but all humans.
That's what all Hegelians believe about themselves, it's certainly not limited to Hegelian Jews.
Obama has same ideology.
The enemy is not of the flesh, it is informational.
o7
Where are all the criticisms from the muhjoo shills on J6 unselect committee deleting evidence?
Kek, complicit.
Hitler was a puppet following orders of the tri families.
Your labelling it a lie, is itself a lie.
I really like it.
Are you really trying to explain that your post is proof all the muhjoos called out the J6 unselect committee deleted evidence?
Please tell me it's a joke.
Yes the one with Thompson and Cheney leading.
"Neither the Marxians nor the racists nor the supporters of any other brand of polylogism ever went further than to declare that the logical structure of mind is different with various classes, races, or nations. They never ventured to demonstrate precisely in what the logic of the proletarians differs from the logic of the bourgeois, or in what the logic of the Aryans differs from the logic of the non-Aryans, or the logic of the Germans from the logic of the French or the British. In the eyes of the Marxians the Ricardian theory of comparative cost is spurious because Ricardo was a bourgeois. The German racists condemn the same theory because Ricardo was a Jew, and the German nationalists because he was an Englishman. Some German professors advanced all these three arguments together against the validity of Ricardo's teachings. However, it is not enough to reject a theory wholesale by unmasking the background of its author. What is wanted is first to expound a system of logic different from that applied by the criticized author. Then it would be necessary to examine the contested theory point by point and to show where in its reasoning inferences are made whichalthough correct from the point of view of its author's logicare invalid from the point of view of the proletarian, Aryan, or German logic. And finally, it should be explained what kind of conclusions the replacement of the author's vicious inferences by the correct inferences of the critic's own logic must [p. 76] lead to. As everybody knows, this never has been and never can be attempted by anybody."
https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/657
>>19338765
>>19338766
If you're against all derp, you're for all derp.