Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 9:36 p.m. No.19338137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8144 >>8169

Comes in, accuses Anons of derailing things when they express their displeasure, with a known divisive persona that has been caught multiple times doing shady shit. You really can't make it up how fucking stupid they are.

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 9:44 p.m. No.19338183   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8201

>>19338143

You just need a brian.

>>19338144

That's the thing. You'd have to dig back. That's what they're rely on. Let the heat cool down on this persona, this only access to the kitchen they have left, until they think it's safe, until they think Anons have forgotten then bring it back when it's time to derail things or to make them feel like they have a win after getting their shit pushed in. It's okay though. They're raging against the coming of the light.

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 10:19 p.m. No.19338357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

The thing that makes me laugh the most about it is: There's a core group of Anons, there's a rotating crew of chucklefucks - they rotate personas like they repeat the list of tactics - and they, not all, somehow pretend like every new bread they can't be spotted and everything is reset to start their shit again. When a small group has been interacting with each other for years they can recognize each other. There are 50 UIDs active; the only people they must be trying to convince are the lurkers whose metrics are unknown.

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 10:38 p.m. No.19338446   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8464

Back before Proto was implemented, but during the Summer of Cock that resulted in Proto being developed, who was the baker that would coincidentally show up to bake after the cock spam stopped?

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 11:06 p.m. No.19338589   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8601 >>8610

Let's say for a second that he is a real patriot, on the side of the board: Then burn the personas and be yourself. I don't think he is. His undertone from the /comms days is one ofโ€ฆ

Seeโ€ฆ I'm still talking about it. Derail. That's his whole purpose for showing up here tonight.

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 11:12 p.m. No.19338630   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8653

>>19338610

Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. I mean, what're the chances he'll sneak MuhJoo into notables now that he's like he has caught doing in the past? Just like the media has been caught in lies, they would never lie to you again after the last time they were caught, right? At least it's something to change things up a bit. Maybe he'll be decent and not attack Anons that dare question him.

Anonymous ID: 7a5ad0 Aug. 10, 2023, 11:28 p.m. No.19338741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19338728

Remember the time Gary posted that MuhJoo link, you know, the same one the BVs have been deleted lately, and you included it. Do you remember your reaction to when I asked you why you were putting it in there? Do you remember my reaction? That was the moment. Then it got removed, and your avatarfag-persona disappeared for half to 3/4 of a year. Remember?