> I'm a free speech absolutist.
Fair enough.
if someone continuously talks over another person, is that free speech?
How about a handful of antifa shills yelling over a speaker trying to shut him down?
If shills post as many as 200-400 posts per bread in an effort to disrupt board ops, is this free speech?
This is why shills SHILL: to disrupt.
BONUS: they get to post stuff that discredits Q, then turn around and accuse anons of being terrorists.
Ghandi was a peace absolutist. Could remain so under British rule of India. If the Chinese had moved in, he'd be toast. IMO.
Godspeed,
must depart.