>>19341494 (pb)

>FACTS

>uhhhh don't read the bible

>the bible WARNS about translations

>so what you have to read is the original, which I have

>it even says so on the first page

>"THE BIBLE - ORIGINAL EDITION"

Are you joking now?

>>19341503 (pb)

>trust this book

>if you don't trust it, you are dense

>no arguments

Hilarious

>but but no one could have written that book without the work of "God" and "Jesus" to control people

Hilarious

You can also tell me corona is real and not the flu, I wouldn't beLIEve that either.

But in fact to be fair my stance is that I don't know.

Maybe Jesus existed, maybe not. I don't know. You don't know that either.

Maybe he was just a regular human, I do not know.. some sources even say that this was the case and that all the supernatural shit was added later, and is bullshit, which sounds reasonable to me personally

Now these are actual facts.

>>19341564

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions

Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, false statements of fact, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech.

speech that incites imminent lawless action

true threats

false statements of fact

commercial speech (aka spam)

There ya go

>>19341584

>so you believe no one can know

>I "feel" it

Yeah, you don't know either.

You are like the corona believers, or climate change believers.

>there are experts and there are books

or the best one

>I heard Jesus in my dreams

You heard your own thoughts in your dreams.

Great job, Scott.

>>19341613

>to the test

>source

What source?

You imagine God speaking to you and then it happens and you pretend that's real and is a proof?

Hey, Fauci spoke to me yesterday. He said he's rotting in Gitmo.

>If truth is your goal, exhaust your resources.

There doesn't exist any proof for any.

Books don't mean shit. It's fucking books written by humans, for fuck's sake.

It's like a fairy tale for pseudo-adults.

>>19341651

I can grasp that others like you can IMAGINE things, and then pretend that it's real.

Like virologists, that pretend that there are tiny things flying around and infecting you.

In my opinion that doesn't exist.

I could be wrong of course, but in that case I'm pretty sure.

>He warned

stop putting words into your idol's mouth.

>believe

>facts

no, it's belief, make-belief.

>go against the bible

"Either you are with us, or against us"

Hello GW Bush.

How's your day?

>>19341687

ftfy

>>19341691

>truth is truth

book doesn't equal truth

and truth in a book doesn't equal Jesus existed and that supernatural stuff happened

>but he healed

book says he did, we don't know

I can probably heal Ulcerative Colitis with 3 things too. Doesn't make me God or supernatural or whatever.

>but he fed a large group with a fish

books says so

maybe Jesus made good fish soup

>THEY

Who is "THEY"?

You are now speaking of yourself in the third person?

>>19341713

>>19341763

So now you even say that Jesus is God, aren't you.

Doesn't your bible tell you to not have any other God besides "God"?

>but but Jesus is God

So your God is dead

>no,Jesus died

So Jesus isn't God

>he is, and he died

So God is dead

>no, Jesus died, but survived

So Jesus didn't die and God isn't dead

See, that's how insane you sound.

>read it again

Why?

I have better things to do with my time than to read human written books, that to me look like a way to control people and you are even the best example.

Your reaction even shows that you are irrational, and would probably even cave my head in because I don't go along with your "facts". and you even basically put me into the "satan"-camp, simply because I say "a book is not proof". How dare I say that I don't know.

How dare I don#t repeat what you say.

How dare I

>>19341821

>Who told you Jesus is dead?

so you aren't one of these fags screaming "Jesus died for my sins"?

So no resurrection happened and no crucifixion?

>I and the father

which translation and why?

Q source claiming the opposite of what you are claiming.

What is "Truth"?

>>19341861

The regular population is paying that as well.

So no imports then.

For what do you need an expensive military when the population carries guns, except for illegal invasions of course?

>>19341885

Did OG Germany require tariffs?

I don't think so.

Again: what do you need an expensive military for in the first place?

When citizens are armed, what's the point when you don't invade all sorts of countries?

When all you want is to protect your nation?

Armed citizens do that already, free of charge.

>>19341910

What claims do I make?

What claims did I make?

I made an assumption, because most bible-fags do what I say. I never said that you would do that, I simply assumed it.

and then I asked you if in your version there was no

>He defeated death

nvm

>the original

Okay, where do I get this "original", which somehow must be English, otherwise you couldn't quote from it. and how do you factually provide proof that it's really "the original"?

>Jesus is the Way, and the Truth, and the Life.

Wait, you are that faggot.

>He is in us

Maybe Jesus was simply a regular human and wouldn't like

wait a moment,what does your "original" (tm) bible say about idol worshipping?

>>19341967

you are irrational, that's a fact.

And look up the definition of "probably". you sound insane to me, and also angry, although that makes no sense. I didn't even claim your Jesus didn't exist after all.

>Who is They?

That's a question, not a claim.

and you haven't answered it.

>You are now speaking of yourself in the third person?

That's a question, not a claim.

Are you new to English?

see, you act like an insane person.

You get asked something, and you think it's a claim instead.

And some insane persons especially "religious" ones cave other people's heads in, because they dared to question something they don't like.

>You're the one talking about an "original". Why are you asking me?

Aren't you the one going about "translations bad"?

If not, tell me which translation is correct and with factual proof.

If yes, tell me where to find "the original" (no translation) with factual proof that it's the original.

again:

what does your "original" (tm) bible say about idol worshipping?

(or translated bible, whatever you are into)

why are you ignoring my questions?

and then falsely judging me?

>>19342005

>free speech has "defined rules.

the concept of free speech has rules, otherwise you could also scream "fire" in a crowded cinema without a fire being there and claim that it was free speech and you shouldn't get arrested for doing that.

In fact you could SWAT someone, and then claim free speech as well. That also doesn't work.

>>19342046

>I'm not irrational

your posts say otherwise and speak volumes in fact.

>because you're incapable of understanding.

False claim.

I aked for factual proof.

You don't have any, but claim truth, which is ridiculous.

At least admit that you belief in a human written book and that you don't have any proof, you don't even know if you got the original, or which translation is correct, etc.

>You also made a false claim of me speaking in the third person

Am I talking to a stupid ChatGPT bot?

No, I did not. a QUESTION is not a CLAIM.

I don't like repeating myself.

>original scripture

Again: where is the factual proof that that's the original?

How do you KNOW?

>jesus told me

Did Jesus also tell you about English and what claims actually are?

>>19342069

>Speech against government WAS SUPPOSED to be protected

Screaming "fire" in a cinema is speech against the government?

Calling the police about you being in a hostage situation and telling them lies is speech against the government?

What's your point?

>>19342107

No, asking logical questions regarding a reply, which to me makes no sense in context.

>there shouldn't be any rules

regarding free speech is idiotic

Let alone would give antifa an easy way to shut anyone else down. Just scream louder than anybody else. Also see shills on here. spam muhjoo 400 times a thread and bam you got a home-made anti-semitic board, just what the fake news wants.

>>19342115

>>19342136

>this is not a question

>I need a question to be stated in this specific way, otherwise it's not a question despite the big QUESTION MARK

>i'm totally rational

it's time to stop posting

>Again, YOU are asking about original scripture, not me

You promote it.

you deliver factual proof that it's original scripture, which you can't.

end of story.

>>19342137

>You can ask Kanye

Kanye is a member of "the club" aka a liar.

Fuck that piece of shit.

>>19342175

>no you

You are the irrational one.

You claimed I was making claims, which I wasn't.

The only actual claim I made is that you are irrational, which you are and you provide proof for that all on your own.

>scripture

written words, doesn't change anything.

Where is the factual proof that your scriptures are even originals and weren't modified?

What are the correct translations of these?

You got nothing, it's all made up and it's perfect for division.

"No, my king james bible is correct"

"No, my scripture is correct, I'm the truth hurr"

yada yada

And then you get people that cave heads in, because of fucking books. Call them scripture, I don't care, it's still books in the end. Written words.

>>19342217

>I redefine what a question is

It's time to stop posting, you are trolling now.

>You keep arguing for translations

I don't.

Stop with your false claims.

Are you a bot? you act like one.

>use them all

What