Anonymous ID: 113f0f Aug. 12, 2023, 7:24 a.m. No.19345551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5561 >>5592 >>5607

>>19345519

Anon already knew about this event. This was when Comey broke protocol and sent two FBI thugs to the WH to interrogate and frame Flynn.

 

"What we are seeing is a meticulously planned-out scheme to try to get a 33-year combat veteran of the United States to say something that was inaccurate so that they would have a basis to try to charge him with false statements or otherwise get him fired," McCarthy told FNC's Martha MacCallum on "The Story".

 

Latest 4am talking point Aug 2023: "Flynn was a secret deep state operative all along".

Kek

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/04/30/comey_i_sent_fbi_agents_into_the_white_house.html#!

 

New 4am talking point: Flynn

Anonymous ID: 113f0f Aug. 12, 2023, 7:45 a.m. No.19345650   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19345632

>What does Weiss know which is out of the purview of any of the others?

Could you elaborate a bit more. What would Weiss knowing anything about anyone have to do with labelling Weiss as special prosecutor in order to protect the Bidens?

Now Weiss is 'off limits' as a witness.

Or is he?

Anonymous ID: 113f0f Aug. 12, 2023, 8:16 a.m. No.19345812   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5848

Trump's Trial will BE his campaign.

 

Imagine knowing 2015 and prior that everything known about the globalist cult that infiltrated media, doj, fbi, c_a, etc, all of that intelligence could not itself bring the cult down, it all has to be legally ENTERED into the court system for adjudication/analysis/judgment.

 

It shouldn't have had to be this way, but if the Presidential campaign of 2024 LOOKED like a 'public' court case, where the judge is God, thd lawyers are counsel for Q+ and Potato, and the jury is the 'public mind'…

It's not what Anon would have expected or asked for, but thankful that at least it's all coming out.

 

There is no possible avenue for any federal judge to insert themselves as 'final' authority and scrutinize every sentence and use 'orders' to ban or allow speech, to be dictator over what can and cannot hcibe said by candidates running for President.

Whichever judge tried to declare themselves as final authority OVER POLITICAL SPEECH SPOKEN BY CANDIDATES FOR POLITICAL OFFICE, are doomed to an embarrassing failure.

Let any of the bribed, blackmailed, 'on team' radical left anti-Constitutional judges go after Q+ and demand 'you can't talk about that it's illegal'. Let any of them try. It will fun to watch them find they have no power to stop Q+'s or Biden's speech.