The Facebook settlement does not include Facebook admitting wrongdoing, apparently. Maybe their use of account holders' data isn't the only issue, but also what they did with the data? Pic related.
I've posted information from this article many times over the last 4 or so years, but I keep coming back to it because it keeps coming up in my thinking.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-social-media-became-the-perfect-incubator-for-hoaxes-and-misinformation/
Why Social Media Became the Perfect Incubator for Hoaxes and Misinformation
The article admits to looking at data from 55 million US Facebook users, but was written in such a way that two "conspiracy theories" are backhandedly or perhaps intentionally vilified.
These were the conspiracy theories that 1. Jade Helm 15 was the beginning of a coup by Barack Obama and 2. That vaccines cause autism.
In retrospect it looks to me like there was some "pre-bunking" going on. The goals were several. Probably one thing was to let "intelligent" and "scientific" readers understand that to question either "Jade Helm" or "vaccines" was to become a conspiracy theorist (that unscientific knuckle dragging heathen). Also, the article shows the efforts to see if people could be brought back to the official narrative. Now why or why would it be so important to get people to move away from the idea of an Obama coup and away from the idea vaccines can be dangerous? Perhaps if you are actually involved in a coup against the lawful US government and you want to use vaccine bioweapons as part of your efforts.