Anonymous ID: ed2b15 Aug. 12, 2023, 10:31 a.m. No.19346376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6393

Pedowood wrap up smears as 'controversial' 'celebrity' 'lives' 'internal division dialectic', to be trusted as something other than a projection of same polylogism a priorism that has no supporting output of its own full sources supporting a practical application of bodily law enforcement 'against' any human being's body as if the source's dialectic projection somehow is supposed to be trusted as itself being sourced as willingly and knowingly contradicting/BREAKING THE LAW, and the public mind is supposed to think 'everyone in 'this' group' apologize to everyone in 'that' group instead, and just accept the knowing law violations from sources claiming for themselves the final assessment from a INFILTRATED VOICE OPS of 'highest level' by narrative output to dominate what the public mind is to accept as a false 'this or that' 'happened' now keep talking like that to deceive public mind into echoing the split truth that is really just a repeatedly declared final static private, trust voices or else what public mind may learn as a truth is to be 'opposed' by the 'other' side of the same source dialectic projection that Anon sees and can know can only be consistently 'voiced' if the voice is a voice not 'only' two voices of 'personas' of 'hide dialectic in a two person 'relationship' -public mind is to think in accordance with seeing themselves as the source rather than the 'posturing' scam artistry writing this pattern of scripts.

Probably 'improvement' if a certain pattern of 'strikes' become permanent?

Hunting populations with ideological/spiritual/bodily/soul 'anti' narrative from same source denouncing the 'anti' narrative in the first place in time and could only be human knowing as extending from same source as human psychological 'tendency' ('op mockingbird 'pushed' to be trusted/ingested as never the responsibility of the human mind as responsibility of that same human mind.

"echo" of division to trick trusting human minds into thinking according to polylogism at all given nobody has ever showed how the logic of the human mind can see a consistent inconsistency as the only 'possible' set of what is and and is not to be 'spoken at water coolers'.

It is itself and can only be a knowing human mind intent that could ever output a repeat pattern of divide and conquer in 'all' forms of object information 'histories'.

Polylogism 'applied' is knowing generations of inconsistencies/['lies'] trusted at source as 'just think everything that anyone does is because 'either this or that' approved polylogism as if any other pattern, UNILOGISM/consistency('truth').echoed(), it's not 'this' source responsible for what happens from it.

Anon does not accept internal division from 'one source' merely because an unsourced/firewall 'speaks' their own minds 'AS IF' it describes humanity as in claiming to know the minds of everyone else of 'truth is illegal'.

Persecution of Q+ is in this Anon mind a 'panicked' 'counter' to truths about Biden treason now in public mind.

Public mind has to now 'think' 'equilibrium' with a source knowingly generating false prosecutions to 'control' the public mind?

How is that ever needed to be tolerated by any complex system of any size and age and existential sourcing.

 

'public should think apologize//biggest threat fake/falsified/real world division becomes 'echoed' to real by deception not full source transparency from the sources speaking the accusations,

 

J6 committee deleted the evidence?

 

Anons see that as 99.9999999999999999999999% or higher evidence of hiding lies/falsehoods/scam/WEAPONIZATION of federal law enforcement directed 'against' the public mind, source of accusation itself wittholding source to the accused and the public.

Anonymous ID: ed2b15 Aug. 12, 2023, 10:36 a.m. No.19346393   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6412

>>19346376

When the public 'learns', polylogism becomes transparent as human made, and unilogism is in this Anon's opinion the pattern of 'public awakening is their greatest fear' side of a learning about how some human minds are ideologically hunting other human minds, through censorship and hostile attacks/deletions of evidence supporting prior 'hysterical' voices?

Anonymous ID: ed2b15 Aug. 12, 2023, 10:39 a.m. No.19346412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6434

>>19346393

Nobody has ever shown how the logical structure of the human mind differs between races, classes, or nations.

Polylogism is a 'thought' pattern, a projection, that could become 'weaponized' if the knowing intent to deceive is kept 'hidden' from the logos of a person speaking about their own 'understandings' voiced.

Anonymous ID: ed2b15 Aug. 12, 2023, 10:45 a.m. No.19346434   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19346412

Consistency is Consistency and Inconsistency is Inconsistency: unilogism.

Consistency can only be consistently consistent when the source is speaking consistently with how its own system is generating 'accusations' of inconsistencies applied, to control public mind to think 'that' whenever the public mind also hears truth of Bidens selling VP office, accepting bribes, coercing governments to prosecute investigators investigating the accusing investigators.

A is A and ~A is ~A.

Anonymous ID: ed2b15 Aug. 12, 2023, 12:56 p.m. No.19346964   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anon can see J6 'unselect'…kek unselect is a good name to describe what appears to actually be happening. Delete evidence at J6 'unselect' committee level to imprison a leading candidate for POTUS47, 3 years delayed, then suddenly it's supposed to be the world's problems and anyone who is inconsistent for good reasons are to be smeared and slandered 24/7 with bad cloud verbiage Anon not going to list.

 

J6 committee appears to have logic proof of inconsistent self.behavior.

Delete own evidence of accusations against accused to prevent public from…seeing that very inconsistency as an inconsistency 'cult attachment' in 'acting' with 'separated complete dictionary' meanings of what it even means to have integrity(consistency) in what is thought and 'approved' 'channels' of what is censored and uncensored polylogist introduction / projection / no proof.

Anon admits to possibly stating inconsistent streams together over time, but still knows that whatever 'self.deletion' Anon does it's a necessary sacrifice to making a good impression but never a fully true statement (thoughts/intent/it's finite in time). Anon is incomplete in order to be more consistent, 'power' in posturing of knowing false accusations that have punishments of prison or worse, that takes some sick evil twisted 'trust' in it being anything more than a projection to trick trusting minds to 'apologize' or be shamed by the projected accusations of self.admitCrime in the very shaming populations and the 'narrative' with hoax after hoax?

Inconsistent 'personas' of the same body are never proved about all by that mind's own inconsistent pattern of choice. To knowingly flaunt the law to the point of DELETING EVIDENCE.

That's what it would look like if it had looked as though criminals are protecting criminals by making truth illegal and justice and SPEECH from the accused censored as 'legal'.

 

Dialectic projection 'shaming itself' into speech of accusations, no proof, fake, false, criminal itself, and world is supposed to accept a source sourcing its own inconsistencies as truth allegedly 'final static' narrative that only divides for the sake of its own 'truth' power to weaponize to drive a humans against humans impacting all humanity ritualistic practise of being 'blind' to the truth.

 

There should be a law where any governmental accusatory body 'reps' who delete evidence of their own accusations to hide knowing lies and deception - capitoal puniparty. Make the incentive to delete be experienced as self deletion because the lies are to make prison and worse a punishment against it. Anon cannot ever think any positivity in accuser accusing you and when you ask for evidence they delete it, after spending years false slandering you.

If the source knowingly deletes its information of what led to accusations against you, would you ever trust it?

But have to 'accept consequences' from fed level law enforcement if you say ran for POTUS as a candidate in a free and fair election?

Deleting evidence, that means they are either really in a bad spot 'public mind' dominance perspective.