Except of course when the baker turns out to be a psyop persona with a narrative steering agenda.
I find that anyone who is addressing two or more prior poasts in one poast is almost always a clown persona.
I think they do it to split conversational threads and make it harder to follow dissenting voices.
The Rainbow Banner Celebrates Sexual Deviancy
Wen you see that gay banner, you know that:
a) The baker is a clown
b) That the baker has multiple IPs that they will use to support their own narrative
c) That an organized shill operation is active on the board.
Strange, you respond to the bifurcated post comment on a different ID to the poster of the bifurcated comment.
How many devices you running today Loretta?
The tranime persona (baking right now) is a psyop designed to be infuriating. It's highly effective. It plays a smug, self involved, sexually deviant asshole.
It's intent is simple. Discredit posts, selectively edit notables and drive off researchers.
Where in your copy pasta examples is there a post addressing/responding to two posts Loretta?
There isn't. So no, not me then.
The nature of the board makes it simple to hijack a persona and then use it against the board.
I could start posting Mr Pig or Swordy and start pumping out muhjoo shill content allegedly from them. Persona's hurt the purpose of the board. That's why shills love them so much. Tranime, perfect example of persona abuse.
Oh and I missed the IP hop in all of that too.
Your 1st ammendment rights are intact. You can at any time fuck off somewhere else and poast your invective and bile without restriction.
But you don't do that, you come here instead. Strange. It's almost like you need to push your irrelevant bullshit narrative into an unrelated conversation.
Why is that?
Listen up asshole.
Deletions come not from the content, but the behavior.
Incessant spamming of Teletubbies memes would result in deletion.
If your shit was..
a) True
b) New
c) Verifiable
d) Adding to the QR conversation
then it might not get deleted.
If it is…
a) Old
b) Repetitive
c) Unverifiable
d) Disconnected from current events
e) Injected with no connection to any conversation
Then it deserves to be tossed out.