Have you decided that "qresearch" written in the source code is a fetter?
Hey look everyone, it's the board persona denouncing board personas, echoing the same thing denouncing echoes, trying to control the board while denouncing trying to control the board, and on and on, and everyone is supposed to think it's a consistent description of the board and not just an inconsistent projection of one poster.
>just to say I'm doing bigly yuge at destroying the gatekeeper board
Yes forgot to include that projection as well.
Hey look everyone, it's the board persona denouncing board personas, trying to gatekeep while denouncing gatekeeping, echoing the same thing denouncing echoes, trying to control the board while denouncing trying to control the board, and on and on, and everyone is supposed to think it's a consistent description of the board and not just an inconsistent projection of one poster.
Kek
Hey look everyone, Anon thinking they have everything figured out wants to label Anon's one single reply to one single inconsistent post as trying to figure everything out.
Pretty sure Anon did.
>What information am I gatekeeping?
You're trying to gatekeep the information posted to Qresearch.
>The fact that the same group of shills have sycophantically eaten each others asses 365 days a year for 5+ years every single day with copy pasta just to create a trusted and known board personality and then when questioned on it all gang up with the echo chamber to attempt to stifle any dissent?
Kek, that's precisely what you're doing. You're the same poster who writes 'another day at the office' copypasta.
Everything you're denouncing about others, is a projection of your own psychology.
Clowns still want to trick Anons into thinking competitor of clown controlled Threads is a clown.
>Provide a single example
Already did. A 'single example' is the very first gatekeep post I replied to:
There is no difference in logic between your post and the posts you're denouncing. You're doing what you say others are wrong for doing.
BTW, you do not need to be persuaded by Anon's statement that you're trying to gatekeep while denouncing gatekeeping, before Anon knows it's true. Whatever you reply with here, denials, deflections, smears, it's just more proof you're doing what you claim to denounce.
It's your own projection.
You mimicking what you claim to denounce, isn't a criticism, it's participation.
>You don't answer the question
Your lie that the question wasn't answered isn't proof the question wasn't answered.
>Provide one specific example of me gatekeeping information
Already did, for the second time:
This is an example you trying to gatekeep information posted to qresearch.
This is another example of you trying to gatekeep.
>I find that anyone who is addressing two or more prior poasts in one poast is almost always a clown persona
So you then?
Sorry not you, friendly fire.
>when anyone dared to question any of these "board personalities
Anon always found it funny when a projecting gatekeeping shill tries to redefine the word "question" to mean non-questioning smears, non-questioning copypasta mimicry of what you denounce.
>I'm no board personality
Denial denial denial.
You are doing exactly what you claim to denounce.
Anon fucked up, my bad,
This is a privately owned and controlled site.
The 1st amendment is a rule applicable to the government, not qresearch.
There are LOTS of opportunities for muhjoo shills to post muhjoo spam to dedicated 8kun boards
https://8kun.top/index.html
But the muhjoo shills are not satisfied with merely having the ability to write on 8kun, no, they DEMAND that their garbage is SEEN on qresearch specifically, such that if it isn't then the sky is falling, free speech violated, blah blah blah.
Anons notice very clearly that the muhjoo spammers who smear and attack BV/BO for deleting the spam are in fact trying to cover up and deflect from their own nefarious malicious intent to SPAM qresearch with division narrative.
Isn't it more efficient to take up only one post to address multiple other posts, instead of posting individually which takes up more bread?
>Can you link to a single post of mine denouncing Trump?
It's possible to do so across breads given your ID resets. It is possible for you to gatekeep in one bread, such as this one, trying to control the 'optics' of memes that seem to trigger you, and then smear Trump in the next, to then muhjoo spam the next, to then vaticanshill spam the next.
All you do is project your own activity, trying desperately to 'blend in' to besmirch the meme magic that triggers you.
Yes where did they go, given that your persona right now is gatekeeper shill?
Totally a coincidence that such patterns are absent as you post gatekeeping spam instead.
Kek
Your posts here in this bread ARE the evidence.
Projecting gatekeeping shill trying to besmirch memes that display positivity,