Which now begs the questions "What did that guy know, and WHEN did he know it?" This is something everyone should see.
Q asked us if he should be added to the list. I think we have a resounding "YES" from the anons.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/
Anon posted a link to a video last night. It is a movie (foreign, of course) of a girl riding a pillow while she was watching a western on TV. The sister watches her "going at it" on the pillow with this fucked up expression (that a child should never make). Then the girl "has a seizure" (or so the mother thinks).
It was sick. I bet that's the one they are referring to.
Of course. I get digits and didn't post a redhead.
>>1925521
Observant. I like to just post the links right to 8ch from my twitter. That and screencaps.
>Because I do not like the idea of hauling
>Underage kids up before a judge
>For doing what comes naturally
>And filming it on their phone
>And posting it online
Nobody is suggesting that Chad and Stacey get life in the penn for being horny teenagers. And as far as filming/posting it online, well, yeah; that's a parenting issue.
What's being tracked down here are predators. People in their 20s and up preying on 15 and unders. Each state might have its own law on age of consent, but let's face it; Age of physical and mental maturity doesn't always work on par together (normally not at all) and if you have SUCH a gap with one of them at SUCH a young age, then there's a problem.
ANY person sexualizing a preteen or younger needs to be met with swift justice. Period.
Well, you do have to admit that what's happening here with Q is quite series of awesome events. You'd be hard pressed to find someone that isn't at least somewhat excited. Outside of that, there are a shit ton of shills bombarding the breads with various shill posts that give the rest of us anons a bad rep.