TY NotaBaker
In the everyday world we attach “me” to our body and to that “me” we attach multiple defined identities. Religious, racial, social, economic –
How real are those defined identities?
To some of us they're extremely real.
To others, including most of the satanist pedovore cult con artists we contend with, none of those identities are real.
Our ethnic, racial and religious identities, to the cultist’s way of thinking, are simply masks, sheep's clothing, to be worn or exchanged at convenience.
Pedovores assume and discard Catholic, Jewish, evangelical protestant, and secular humanist identities as easily as they express right wing, left wing or centrist ideological positions. These labels are meaningless to pedovores who use our treasured identities as protective camouflage for the abduction and ritual abuse of our children as well as economic depredation.
Ideologies and dogmas are cognitive malware. They make effective smokescreens.
Whatever identity mask they adopt, cult pedovores need and seek access to vulnerable children.
We have found satanist pedovore cultists running major charitable organizations, respected foundations and reputable institutions which are collectively responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of national and international programs targeting “at risk” ie vulnerable children – all under pretext of helping.
Children's Defense Fund is a prime example of a pedovore social subversion weaponized as a charitable construct. CDF is endorsed by the biggest “stars” and executives in the entertainment business.
https://www.childrensdefense.org/
Most of the same people were also involved in starting the National Center for Missing and Exploited children, which gave pedovores both access to children and a heads-up early warning system because the creepy sham center for M&E children started the “Amber Alert Service” run by the evil pedovore Laura Silsby, arrested for kidnapping “orphaned” children (parents alive) in Haiti.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life_Children%27s_Refuge_case
Pedovores are con artists, they steal your wallet and offer to help you look for it.
Similarly, when communities ask themselves, "who's going to care for our orphans?" Pedovores always have their hands up, and may style themselves Catholics Jews or evangelicals in order facilitate access.
https://parentalrights.org/child_protective_services/
Pedovores don't believe in national, religious or ethnic identities. cultists are identity-shifters who embed themselves in ethnic, religious or ideological communities and seek control of fund raising and identity defining structures.
Pedovores run such organizations today, hiding behind the benign philanthropic reputation of do-gooder charities, fake foundations and NGOs.
This is information war, and that's how IW is fought.
DIG MEME PRAY
DL is a much bigger player than he is currently getting credit for.
This is why
His sect Gelugpa ('Yellow Hat'}views building a stupa on enemy territory to be occult conquest.
The DLs sect has systematically built Stupas all over EU and the US.
The current DL is the supposed reincarnation of "the Great 5'th" DL.
The great 5'th DL was the premier necromancer of the Gelugpa sect, and he made alliance with the Mongol Khan.
>Allying themselves with the Mongol Khans, the Gelug school emerged as the pre-eminent Buddhist school in Tibet and Mongolia since the end of the 16th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelug
In return the great 5'th got help murdering his own people and crushing rival sects in Tibet. The Khan got an ally, the foremost necromancer of the world, one who would carry the battle to the enemy down the centuries. The Khan was correct and the DL wages war in that alliance to this day.
>Following violent strife among the sects of Tibetan Buddhism, the Gelug school emerged as the dominant one, with the military help of the Mongol GĂĽshri Khan in 1642.
If we look at how Uma Thurman's father, Robert Thurman deceptively translated the sacred writings to conceal their true nature, intention and objectives, we see how this spiritual fraud was perpetrated.
references:
http://www.trimondi.de/SDLE/Contents.htm
China's ancient water pipe networks show they were a communal effort with no evidence of a centralized state authority
A system of ancient ceramic water pipes, the oldest ever unearthed in China, shows that neolithic people were capable of complex engineering feats without the need for a centralized state authority, finds a new study by University College London researchers.
In a study published in Nature Water, the archaeological team describe a network of ceramic water pipes and drainage ditches at the Chinese walled site of Pingliangtai dating back 4,000 years to a time known as the Longshan period. The network shows cooperation among the community to build and maintain the drainage system, though no evidence of a centralized power or authority.
Dr. Yijie Zhuang (UCL Institute of Archaeology), senior and corresponding author on the paper, said, "The discovery of this ceramic water pipe network is remarkable because the people of Pingliangtai were able to build and maintain this advanced water management system with stone age tools and without the organization of a central power structure. This system would have required a significant level of community-wide planning and coordination, and it was all done communally."
The ceramic water pipes make up a drainage system which is the oldest complete system ever discovered in China. Made by interconnecting individual segments, the water pipes run along roads and walls to divert rainwater and show an advanced level of central planning at the neolithic site.
https://phys.org/news/2023-08-china-ancient-pipe-networks-communal.html?
Despite fails, ChatGPT wins showdown against Stack Overflow
In the early 2000s, computer hobbyists could walk into any of nearly 700 Barnes and Noble bookstores and find aisle after aisle filled with manuals on programming, coding, design, the internet and virtually any other topic even remotely related to computing. Scores of magazines supplemented this sanctuary for computer addicts.
Those rows have all but disappeared since those days, due to the way users now obtain information. Digital books and internet resources have largely replaced those stacks of books.
One key resource that has contributed to the decline is Stack Overflow, an highly respected online community of 20 million registered users who share advice and solutions to questions on all aspects of programming. Since its inception in 2008, participants have asked more than 24 million questions and received more than 35 million answers.
But the much-admired site has taken a hit this year, a victim of the spiraling popularity of chatbots such as ChatGPT, though Stack Overflow is still an indispensable resource for many.
An analytics firm reported in May that Stack Overflow had suffered several straight months of drops in traffic averaging 6% since the first of the year. In April, there was a 17.7% drop from March numbers.
Are defectors flocking to ChatGPT making a wise move?
According to a new study from Purdue University, "Who Answers It Better? An In-Depth Analysis of ChatGPT and Stack Overflow Answers to Software Engineering Questions," it may not be the best decision.
Researchers found what many already suspected: A significant number of ChatGPT's answers to programming questions were inaccurate or flat-out wrong. Ironically, however, when subjects were asked to compare responses from Stack Overflow and ChatGPT, 40% said they preferred ChatGPT's responses. Why? Because of the "comprehensiveness" and persuasive "articulate language style" of ChatGPT's answers.
Researchers said that 52% of 512 ChatGPT responses to questions were incorrect. Disconcertingly, among the responses preferred by test participants, 77% were wrong.
Even when ChatGPT's responses were blatantly wrong, 2 out of 12 subjects still preferred ChatGPT's answers over Stack Overflow's.
According to Samia Kabir, one of the paper's authors, "Participants ignored the incorrectness when they found ChatGPT's answer to be insightful. The way ChatGPT confidently conveys insightful [even if incorrect] information gains user trust, which causes them to prefer the incorrect answer."
"It is apparent that polite language, articulated and text-book style answers, comprehensiveness, and affiliation in answers make completely wrong answers seem correct," Kabir said.
The researchers noted that large language models have the potential to upend old ways of obtaining programming information. Users seeking help obtain invaluable feedback from a community of experts on sites such as Stack Overflow. But those sites often require a wait of hours or days before solutions are obtained.
ChatGPT can deliver complex coding instructions in seconds, and it will engage in human-like conversation to explore questions in depth.
But knowing the capacity of chatbots to acquire and propagate erroneous information "introduces risks for non-expert end-users who lack the means to verify factual inconsistencies," Kabir said.
Concern over the potential to contaminate informational pools with false data led Stack Overflow earlier this year to bar any response obtained by ChatGPT.
The Purdue researchers termed the preponderance of incorrect answers "alarming." They urged ChatGPT to go beyond the brief disclaimer it posts on each response advising users of the potential for error and specify a level of incorrectness and uncertainty.
"It is imperative to investigate how to communicate the level of incorrectness of the answers," the researchers said in their report, published on the preprint server arXiv on Aug. 10.
"AI is most effective when supervised by humans," the report adds. "Therefore, we call for the responsible use of ChatGPT to increase human-AI productivity."
https://techxplore.com/news/2023-08-chatgpt-showdown-stack.html?